|
Author |
Quote |
Date |
|
2001—A
Space Odyssey |
I
am sure that you are all aware of the extremely grave potential for cultural
shock and social disorientation contained in this present situation if the
facts were suddenly made public without adequate presentation and
conditioning. |
2002-12-25W |
|
Adams,
Henry |
Nothing
in education is so astonishing as the amount of ignorance it accumulates in
the form of inert facts. |
2002-12-27F |
|
Alcott,
AB |
To
be ignorant of one’s ignorance is the malady of the ignorant. |
2003-03-08S |
|
Alighieri,
Dante |
In
the middle of the journey of our life, I found myself astray in a dark wood
where the straight road had been lost. |
2002-06-27R |
|
Alighieri,
Dante |
The
hottest places in Hell are reserved for those who maintain their neutrality
in times of moral crises. |
2002-12-07S |
|
Archimedes |
Give
me one fixedpoint and I will move the earth. |
2003-02-14F |
|
Atwood,
Margaret |
If
the mental illness of the United States is megalomania—that of Canada is
paranoid schizophrenia. |
2002-12-04W |
|
Augustine |
Endeavor
to think well, for it is the only morality. |
2002-12-27F |
|
Augustine,
Saint |
It
is solved by walking. |
2004-12-16R |
|
Augustine,
Saint |
Miracles
happen, not in opposition to nature, but in opposition to what we know of
nature. |
2003-05-16F |
|
Augustine,
Saint |
The
first step forward is to see that attention is fastened on the truth. |
2002-07-08M |
|
Augustine,
Saint |
The
universe was created with time and not in time. |
2002-12-25W |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
A
few years ago Einstein observed—The idea that there are two structures of
space independent of each other, the metric—gravitational and the
electromagnetic is intolerable to the theoretical spirit. Moreover, as
Relativity showed that energy has mass and mass is congealed energy, the
Unified Field Theory will regard matter simply as a concentration of field.
From its perspective the entire universe will be revealed as an elemental
field in which each star, each atom, each wandering comet and slow-wheeling
galaxy and flying electron is seen to be but a ripple or tumescence in the
underlying spacetime unity. And so a profound simplicity will supplant the
surface complexity of nature; the distinction between gravitational and
electromagnetic force, between matter and field, between electric charge and
field will be forever lost; and matter, gravitation, and electromagnetic
force will all thus resolve into configurations of the four-dimensional
continuum which is the universe. |
2003-01-28T |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Completion
of the Unified Field Theory will climax the long march of science towards
unification of concepts. For within its framework all man’s perceptions of
the world and all his abstract intuitions of reality—matter, energy, force,
space, time merge finally into one. It touches the grand aim of all science,
which, as Einstein defines it, is to cover the greatest number of empirical
facts by logical deduction from the smallest possible number of hypotheses or
axioms. The urge to consolidate premises, to unify concepts, to penetrate the
variety and particularity of the manifest world to the undifferentiated unity
that lies beyond is not only the leaven of science; it is the loftiest
passion of the human intellect. The philosopher and mystic, as well as the
scientist, have always sought through their various disciplines of
introspection to arrive at a knowledge of the ultimate immutable essence that
undergirds the mutable illusory world. More than twenty-three hundred years
ago Plato declared—The true lover of knowledge is always striving after
being. He will not rest at those multitudinous phenomena whose existence is
appearance only. |
2003-01-28T |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Gradually
philosophers and scientists have arrived at the startling conclusion that
since every object is simply the sum of its qualities, and since qualities
exist only in the mind, the whole objective universe of matter and energy,
atoms and stars, does not exist except as a construction of the
consciousness—an edifice of conventional symbols shaped by the senses of man. |
2003-07-21M |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Gradually
philosophers and scientists have arrived at the startling conclusion that
since every object is simply the sum of its qualities, and since qualities
exist only in the mind, the whole objective universe of matter and energy,
atoms and stars, does not exist except as a construction of the consciousness—an
edifice of conventional symbols shaped by the senses of man. |
2002-12-27F |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
In
its popular sense, mass is just another word for weight. But as used by the
physicist, it denotes a rather different and more fundamental property of
matter—namely, resistance to a change of motion. A greater force is necessary
to move a freight car than a velocipede; the freight car resists motion more
stubbornly than the velocipede because it has greater mass. In classical
physics the mass of any body is a fixed and unchanging property. Thus the
mass of a freight car should remain the same whether it is at rest on a
siding, rolling across country at 60 miles an hour, or hurtling through outer
space at 60,000 miles a second. But relativity asserts that the mass of a
moving body is by no means constant, but increases with its velocity. The old
physics failed to discover this fact simply because man's senses and
instruments are too crude to note the infinitesimal increases of mass
produced by the feeble accelerations of ordinary experience. They become
perceptible only when bodies attain velocities close to that of light. And
this phenomenon does not conflict with the relativistic contraction of
length. One is tempted to ask how can an object become smaller and at the
same time get heavier? The contraction, it should be noted, is only in the
direction of motion; width and breadth are unaffected. Moreover mass is not
heaviness but simply the resistance to motion. |
2003-02-27R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
In
man’s brief tenancy on earth he egocentrically orders events in his mind
according to his own feelings past, present, and future. But except on the
reels of one’s own consciousness, the universe, the objective world of
reality, does not happen—it simply exists. It can be encompassed in its
entire majesty only by a cosmic intellect. But it can also be represented
symbolically, by a mathematician, as a four-dimensional spacetime continuum.
An understanding of the spacetime continuum is requisite to a comprehension
of the general theory of relativity and of what it says about gravitation,
the unseen force that holds the universe together and determines its shape
and size. |
2003-02-27R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
In the
evolution of scientific thought, one fact has become impressively clear—that
there is no mystery of the physical world which does not point to a mystery
beyond itself. All highroads of the
intellect, all byways of theory and conjecture lead ultimately to an abyss
that human ingenuity can never span.
For man is enchained by the very condition of his Being, his
finiteness and his involvement in nature.
The further he extends his horizons, the more vividly he recognizes
the fact that, as the physicist Niels Bohr put it, we are both spectators and
actors in the great drama of existence.
Man is thus his own greatest mystery.
He does not understand the vast veiled universe into which he has been
cast for the reason that he does not understand himself. He comprehends little of his organic
process and even less of his unique capacity to perceive the world about him
in his rationality and his dreams.
Least of all does he understand his noblest and most mysterious
faculty—the ability to transcend himself by perceiving himself in the act of
perception. Man’s inescapable impasse
is that he himself is part of the world that he seeks to explore—his body and
proud brain are but mosaics of the same elemental particles that compose the
dark, drifting clouds of interstellar space.
Man is, in the final analysis, merely an ephemeral confirmation of the
primordial spacetime field. Standing
midway between macrocosm and microcosm, he finds barriers on every side and
can perhaps but marvel, as Saint Paul did nineteen hundred years ago in
saying that the world was created by the word of God so that what is seen is
composed of things which do not appear. |
2002-07-09T |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
In
this vast cosmic picture the abyss between macrocosmos and microcosmos—the
very big and the very little—will be bridged, and the whole complex of the
universe will resolve into a homogeneous fabric in which matter and energy
are indistinguishable and all forms of motion from the slow wheeling of the
galaxies to the wild flight of electrons become simply changes in the
structure and concentration of the primordial field. |
2003-03-28F |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
It
is perhaps significant that in terms of simple magnitude man is the mean
between macrocosm and microcosm. Stated
crudely this means that a supergiant red star is just as much bigger than man
as an electron is smaller. |
2003-07-21M |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
It
is perhaps significant that in terms of simple magnitude man is the mean
between macrocosm and microcosm. Stated crudely this means that a supergiant
red star is just as much bigger than man as an electron is smaller. |
2003-01-30R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Just
as Relativity reduced gravitational force to a geometrical peculiarity of the
spacetime continuum, the unified field theory will reduce electromagnetic
force—the other great universal force—to equivalent status. Moreover, as Relativity showed that energy
has mass and mass is congealed energy, the unified field theory will regard
matter simply as a concentration of field.
From its perspective the entire universe will be revealed as an
elemental field in which each star, each atom, each wandering comet and
slow-wheeling galaxy and flying electron is seen to be but a ripple or
tumescence in the underlying spacetime unity.
And so a profound simplicity will supplant the surface complexity of
nature. |
2004-11-28N |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Modern
science was born when Galileo began trying to explain how things happen and
thus originated the method of controlled experiment which now forms the basis
of scientific investigation. |
2004-12-16R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Quantum
theory deals with fundamental units of matter and energy. Relativity deals with space, time and the
structure of the universe as a whole.
Both are accepted pillars of modern scientific thought. |
2003-07-21M |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Quantum
theory deals with fundamental units of matter and energy. Relativity deals
with space, time and the structure of the universe as a whole. Both are
accepted pillars of modern physical thought. |
2003-02-20R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Relativity,
like the quantum theory, draws man's intellect still farther away from the
Newtonian universe, firmly rooted in space and time and functioning like some
great, unerring, and manageable machine. Einstein's laws of motion, his basic
principles of the relativity of distance, time, and mass, and his deductions
from these principles comprise what is known as the special theory of
relativity. In the decade following the publication of this original work, he
expanded his scientific and philosophical system into the general theory of
relativity, through which he examined the mysterious force that guides the
whirling of the stars, comets, meteors, and galaxies, and all the moving
systems of iron, stone, vapor, and flame in the immense inscrutable void.
Newton called this force universal gravitation. From his own concept of
gravitation Einstein attained a view of the vast architecture and anatomy of
the universe as a whole. |
2003-02-27R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Right
now it is a question whether scientific man is in touch with reality at
all—or can ever hope to be. |
2003-07-24R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Right
now it is a question whether scientific man is in touch with reality at
all—or can ever hope to be. |
2003-02-20R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Since
time is an impalpable quantity it is not possible to draw a picture or
construct a model of a four-dimensional spacetime continuum. But it can be
imagined and it can be represented mathematically. And in order to describe
the stupendous reaches of the universe beyond our solar system, beyond the
clusters and star clouds of the Milky Way, beyond the lonely outer galaxies
burning in the void, the scientist must visualize it all as a continuum in
three dimensions of space and one of time. In our minds we tend to separate
these dimensions; we have an awareness of space and an awareness of time. But
the separation is purely subjective; and as special relativity showed, space
and time separately are relative quantities which vary with individual
observers. In any objective description of the universe, such as science
demands, the time dimension can no more be detached from the space dimension
than length can be detached from breadth and thickness in an accurate
representation of a house, a tree, or Betty Grable. According to the great
German mathematician, Herman Minkowski, who developed the mathematics of the
spacetime continuum as a convenient medium for expressing the principles of
relativity—Space and time separately have vanished into mere shadows—and only
a combined notion of the two preserves any reality. |
2003-02-27R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
element of caprice in atomic behavior cannot be blamed on man's
coarse-grained implements. It stems from the very nature of things, as shown
by Heisenberg in 1927 in a famous statement of physical law known as the
Uncertainty Principle. |
2003-02-25T |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
element of caprice in atomic behavior cannot be blamed on man’s
coarse-grained implements. It stems from the very nature of things, as shown
by Heisenberg in 1927 in a famous statement of physical law known as the
Uncertainty Principle. |
2002-12-19R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
functional harmony of nature Berkeley, Descartes, Spinoza and Einstein
attributed to God. |
2003-07-24R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
functional harmony of nature Berkeley, Descartes, Spinoza and Einstein
attributed to God. |
2003-01-30R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
fundamental question of whether light is waves or particles has never been
answered. The dual character of light
is, however, only one aspect of a deeper and more remarkable duality which
pervades all nature. |
2003-07-21M |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
fundamental question of whether light is waves or particles has never been
answered. The dual character of light is, however, only one aspect of a
deeper and more remarkable duality which pervades all nature. |
2003-02-20R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
gateway to universal knowledge may be opened by the unified field theory upon
which Einstein has been at work for a quarter century. Today the outer limits of man’s knowledge
are defined by relativity, the inner limits by the quantum theory. Relativity has shaped all our concepts of
space, time, gravitation and the realities that are too remote and too vast
to be perceived. Quantum theory has
shaped all our concepts of the atom, the basic units of matter and energy,
and the realities that are too elusive and too small to be perceived. Yet these two great scientific systems rest
on entirely different and unrelated theoretical foundations. The purpose of Einstein’s unified field
theory is to construct a bridge between them. |
2005-08-03W |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
human eye suppresses most of the light in the world and what man perceives of
the reality around him is distorted and enfeebled by the limitations of his
organ of vision. |
2003-07-24R |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
human eye suppresses most of the light in the world and what man perceives of
the reality around him is distorted and enfeebled by the limitations of his
organ of vision. |
2002-12-27F |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
irony of man’s quest for reality is that as nature is stripped of its
disguises, as order emerges from chaos and unity from diversity, as concepts
merge and fundamental laws assume increasingly simpler form, the evolving
picture becomes ever more abstract and remote from experience—far stranger
indeed and less recognizable than the bone structure behind a familiar
face. For where the geometry of a
skull predestines the outlines of the tissue it supports, there is no
likeness between the image of a tree transcribed by our senses and that
propounded by wave mechanics, or between a glimpse of the starry sky on a
summer night and the four-dimensional continuum that has replaced our
perceptual Euclidean space. In trying
to distinguish appearance from reality and lay bare the fundamental structure
of the universe, science has had to transcend the rabble of the senses. |
2003-10-28T |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
mathematical orthodoxy of the universe enables theorists like Einstein to
predict and discover natural laws simply by the solution of equations. |
2003-07-28M |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
mathematical orthodoxy of the universe enables theorists like Einstein to
predict and discover natural laws simply by the solution of equations. |
2003-02-25T |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
The
other gateway to this knowledge may be opened by the Unified Field Theory
upon which Einstein has been at work for a quarter century. Today the outer
limits of man’s knowledge are defined by Relativity, the inner limits by the
Quantum Theory. Relativity has shaped all our concepts of space, time,
gravitation, and the realities that are too remote and too vast to be
perceived. Quantum Theory has shaped all our concepts of the atom, the basic
units of matter and energy, and the realities that are too elusive and too
small to be perceived. Yet these two great scientific systems rest on
entirely different and unrelated theoretical foundations. The purpose of
Einstein’s Unified Field Theory is to construct a bridge between them.
Believing in the harmony and uniformity of nature, Einstein hopes to evolve a
single edifice of physical laws that will encompass both the phenomena of the
atom and the phenomena of outer space. Just as Relativity reduced
gravitational force to a geometrical peculiarity of the spacetime continuum,
the Unified Field Theory will reduce electromagnetic force—the other great
universal force—to equivalent status. |
2003-01-28T |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Today
most newspaper readers know vaguely that Einstein had something to do with
the atomic bomb—beyond that his name is simply a synonym for the abstruse.
While his theories form part of the body of modern science, they are not yet
part of the modern curriculum. It is not surprising therefore that many a
college graduate still thinks of Einstein as a kind of mathematical
surrealist rather than as the discoverer of certain cosmic laws of immense
importance in man's slow struggle to understand physical reality. |
2003-01-21T |
|
Barnett,
Lincoln |
Until
a hundred years ago electricity and magnetism—while known and studied since
early Greek times—were regarded as separate quantities. |
2003-05-12M |
|
Barrett,
William |
Essences
Plato called Forms. These Forms, as we saw in the previous chapter, were for
him “really real,” more real than the particular things that derived their
own individual being from participation in the Forms. The circle, that is,
about which the geometrician reasons is the essence common to every
individual circle in nature, and without which the individual circles could
not exist; it is more real than the individual circle that he may draw on the
blackboard for illustration. Now, the circle that the mathematician reasons
about is one he never draws upon the blackboard; it cannot be drawn because
it never comes into existence; it is outside time and therefore eternal. So
too it never comes to be in actual physical space; and it is non-spatial in
the same sense in which it is non-temporal. All the Forms, for Plato, thus
constitute a realm of absolute realities beyond time, change, and existence,
and existence is merely a shadowy replica of essence. When an Idea comes into
existence, it is through a fall (a kind of original sin) from some higher
realm of Being. Time itself—that invisible and tormenting medium of our own
individual existence—becomes merely a shadowy image of eternity. |
2003-01-20M |
|
Barrett,
William |
Existentialism
is an attempt to gather all of the elements of human reality into a total
picture of man. |
2003-01-20M |
|
Barrett,
William |
From
the beginning of Christianity Saint Paul has told us over and over again that
the faith he preaches is foolishness to the Greeks for they demand
wisdom—which Saint Paul believed meant rational philosophy and not religious
faith. |
2003-05-14W |
|
Barrett,
William |
In
Plato’s extraordinary emphasis upon mathematics we see the vestiges of
Pythagoreanism, in which mathematics has been given a sacred, a religious
status. Behind Plato’s emphasis upon mathematics lies his theory of Forms—the
“really real” objects in the universe are the universals or Forms. Particular
things are real only insofar as they exist eternally. |
2003-03-08S |
|
Barrett,
William |
The
price one pays for having a profession is a déformation professionelle,
as the French put it—a professional deformation. The reaction of professional
philosophers to Existentialism was merely a symptom of the philosophers
imprisonment in the narrowness of their own discipline. Never before has
there been a déformation professionelle more in evidence. The divorce
of mind from life was something that simply happened as the result of
philosophers pursuing their own specialized interests. |
2002-12-20F ie. the agency problem |
|
Barrett,
William |
The
psychology of a Pascal is different from that of a Saint Augustine in that
Pascal’s observations of the human condition are among the most negative that
have ever been made. Readers of Sartre who have protested that his psychology
is too morbid or sordid, and possibly therefore only an expression of the
contemporary Paris school of despair, would do well to look into Pascal. They
will find his view of our ordinary human lot every bit as mordant and
clinical as Sartre’s. “The natural misfortune of our mortal and feeble
condition,” Pascal says, “is so wretched that when we consider it closely,
nothing can console us.” Men escape from considering it closely by means of
the two sovereign anodynes of habit and diversion. Man chases a bouncing ball
or rides to hounds after a fleeing animal; or the ball and fleeing game are
pursued through the labyrinth of social intrigue and amusement; anything, so
long as he manages to escape from himself. |
2003-01-20M |
|
Barrett,
William |
The
terror of confronting oneself in situations calling for subjective judgment
is so great that most people immediately panic and run for cover under the
first obvious argument that seems to apply. |
2003-03-08S |
|
Barrett,
William |
There
is a story is told by Kierkegaard of an absent-minded man so abstracted from
his own life that he hardly knows he exists until, one fine morning, he wakes
up to find himself dead. |
2003-01-20M |
|
Beckett,
Samuel |
Nothing
is more real than nothing. |
2002-11-28R |
|
Beecher,
Henry Ward |
The
philosophy of one century is the commonsense of the next. |
2004-12-18S |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Alberta
doctors are to health and wellness what quicksand is to surefootedness. |
2003-01-06M |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
All
I want is a straight fucking answer. |
2003-01-07T |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Aside
from the coffee shop girls—Canada is nothing but one big nest of vampires. |
2002-12-04W |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Christmas
is first and foremost about paying homage to Christ. |
2002-12-11W |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Conscious
is the perceptual apparatus by which we comprehend reality and the essence of
reality is fundamentally different than our conscious perception of it. |
2003-07-3R |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Faith
and reason separately have vanished into mere shadows—and only a combined
notion of the two preserves any reality. |
2004-12-16R |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
I
have this reoccurring dream that I am being paid Derek mo-money Morris
money to philosophize. |
2002-12-11W |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
I
know I am intelligent because I know that I know everything. |
2002-12-22N |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
I
want to be the perfect philosopher. |
2002-12-11W |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
I
won’t forget who my friends are when I’m standing on the podium in Stockholm. |
|
|
Bek,
Christopher |
If
one wishes to better understand the Dark Ages (430-1630) then the most
suitable course of action is to turn on the television set. |
2003-06-20F |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
In
Canada, honourable is just another word for gangster. |
|
|
Bek,
Christopher |
It
is said that every man is either born a Platonist or an Aristotelian. While Plato (428-347 BC) gazed in awe at the universe,
Aristotle (384-322 BC) tried to
explain how it worked. Plato’s theory
of knowledge and theory of forms holds that true or a priori knowledge
must be certain and infallible, and it must be of real objects or Forms. The foundation for Plato and Aristotle was
laid by the Greeks Thales (624-546 BC)
and Pythagoras (582-500 BC) in
founding mathematics. Mathematics is
the systematic treatment of Forms and relationships between Forms. It is the science of drawing conclusions
and is the primordial foundation of absolutely all other science. The Greeks synthesized mathematical
elements from both the Babylonians and the Egyptians in developing the
concepts of proofs, axioms and the logical structure of definitions—all of
which come together to produce what we call mathematical or a priori
reason—which, when combined with empirical or a posteriori validation,
enables us to arrive at a priori knowledge, which is the highest form
of knowledge and is certainly the form of knowledge for which the Government
of Canada refers when proclaiming—Knowledge le savoir. While Thales introduced geometry to ancient
Greece, it was Pythagoras who first provided a mathematical proof of the
Pythagorean theorem, which establishes a priori knowledge that the
square of the length of the hypotenuse of a right-angle triangle is equal to
the sum of the squares of the two sides.
Interestingly, Einstein’s special relativity in 1905 is little more
than an application of the Pythagorean theorem. |
2002-09-16M |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
It
is well established that the greatest scientific problem of all time is how
to marry relativity with quantum theory.
Relativity is the natural law of space and time and is based on
lightspeed. Quantum theory is the
natural law of matter and is based on Planck’s constant. I have solved this problem with my theory
of one by recognizing that lightspeed and Planck’s constant are the same
boundary of the spacetime continuum. I
further argue that even if my theory of one is wrong, it is still effectively
right because it sets forth the pathway to truth—which is the question of how
to unite relativity with quantum theory. |
2005-02-05S |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
My
unified field theory solves the problem Einstein spent the last thirty years
of his life working on by recognizing conscious as electrons or monads—ie.
metaphysical gonads. What we call
consciousness is in fact the accumulation of inertial effects experienced by
the monads as they travel through four-dimensional relativistic bubbles or,
alternatively, through quantum foam. |
2003-04-10R |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Niels
Bohr (1885-1962), one of the founding fathers of quantum theory, defined the
complementary principle as the coexistence of two necessary and seemingly
incompatible descriptions of the same phenomenon. One of its first realizations dates back to
1637 when Descartes revealed that algebra and geometry are the same
thing. In 1860 Maxwell revealed that
electricity and magnetism are the same thing—electromagnetism. In 1905 Einstein revealed that light is
both waves and particles, that matter and energy are the same thing, and that
space and time are the same thing—spacetime.
In 1915 Einstein revealed that gravity and inertia are the same
thing. In 1920 de Broglie revealed
that matter is both waves and particles.
In 1925 Dirac revealed that Schrödinger’s wave-based atomic model and
Heisenberg’s matrix-based atomic model are the same thing—quantum
theory. In 1930 Bohr and Heisenberg
revealed that the complementary principle and the uncertainty principle are
the same thing—the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum theory. In 2001 Bek revealed that lightspeed and
Planck’s constant are the same thing—the boundary of spacetime. |
2005-02-05S |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Recognizing
lightspeed and Planck’s constant as the boundary between spacetime and
nothingness reveals the mechanism that allows electrons and positrons to exit
and re-enter the universe at any point in spacetime. We can also see that the boundary between
spacetime and nothingness is the medium that supports both light and matter
waves. |
2003-02-20R |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Relativity
is the natural law of spacetime based on lightspeed. Quantum theory is the natural law of matter
based on Planck’s constant. The theory
of one unites relativity and quantum theory by recognizing lightspeed and
Planck’s constant as the same boundary of spacetime. Sir James Jeans once described Einstein’s
relativistic universe as the surface of four-dimensional soap bubbles. John Wheeler once described the universe as
empty curved spacetime churned into lathering distorted geometry of quantum
foam formed in the wake of electrons and positrons popping into and out of
existence without limit—revealing that relativistic bubbles are thus
equivalent to quantum foam. |
2003-07-3R |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Socrates
said that no god seeks wisdom—for he is already wise. Upon assuming behaviorism, doctors, judges,
cops and educators effectively issued press releases declaring themselves
gods. As gods, they have no need for
soul-searching to solve problems beyond their defined roles. These self-anointed gods instead focus on
projecting and enforcing their god-status.
What society is left with is a bunch of fragile, narrow-minded
egomaniacs who are totally out of their depth when faced with true freedom
and responsibility. |
2003-07-3R |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
The
pen is mightier than the Glock—and no one’s pen is mightier than mine. |
2002-12-03T |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
The
separate concepts of faith and reason will now fade into the past to be
replaced by the combined concept of mathematical reason. |
2003-02-14F |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
The
single greatest thought problem occupying the world of physics during the
past seventy-five years involved the attempt to unite the macrocosmos of
relativity with the microcosmos of quantum theory. The theory of one resolves this
seventy-five year old thought problem by recognizing the fact that lightspeed
and Planck’s constant are the very same boundary of the spacetime continuum. |
2002-12-28S |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
The
theory of one brings the reader face to face with the stunning realization
that the universe is bounded—rather than unbounded, as Einstein and others
have asserted. The theory of one
delivers the ocean. It is the theory
that spells the end of physics. It is
the monolith of 2001—a spacetime odyssey. |
2003-06-04W |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
The
theory of one brings the reader face to face with the stunning realization
that the universe is bounded—rather than unbounded, as Einstein and others
have asserted. The theory of one
delivers the ocean. It is the theory
that spells the end of physics. It is
the monolith of 2001—a spacetime odyssey. |
2003-02-24M |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
The
word philosophy comes from ancient Greece and is defined as the love of
wisdom. Socrates (470-399 BC) set the
table for Plato (427-347 BC) by radically insisting that we must first answer
the question of what X is before we can say anything else about X. Plato then founded philosophy by daring to
ask what existence would be like outside the cave. Plato’s theory of knowledge and theory of
Forms holds that true or a priori knowledge must be certain and
infallible. The Greeks Thales (624-546 BC) and Pythagoras (582-500 BC)
founded geometry as the very first mathematical discipline. Mathematics
is the systematic treatment of Forms, the science of drawing conclusion and
the primordial foundation of absolutely all other science. While the
Church was jumping up and down on everyone’s head in the Western world for
over a millennium, Arab mathematicians like Muhammad al-Khwârizmî (780-850)
were carrying the ball in founding algebra and algorithms. An algorithm is the procedural
method for calculating and drawing conclusions with Arabic numerals and the
decimal notation. Al-Khwârizmî served
as librarian at the court of Caliph al-Mamun and as astronomer at the Baghdâd
observatory. Interestingly, both the
terms algebra and algorithm stem from the God, Allah. According to Arab philosophy, mathematics is
the way God’s mind works. The Arabs
believe that, by understanding mathematics, they are comprehending the mind
of God. In fact the very core of their
religion lies with the belief that the people must submit to the will of
God’s sovereignty—meaning simply that the Godmade laws of nature (ie.
mathematics) trump the manmade laws of government. The Latin version of al-Khwârizmî’s work is
responsible for a great deal of the mathematical knowledge that resurfaced
during the Renaissance. The notion
that mathematics and God are the very same thing was adapted as the
foundation for the Renaissance by thinkers like Descartes, Pascal, Fermat,
Newton, Locke and Berkeley. Then, in
what John Stuart Mill called the single greatest advance in the history of
science, Descartes fulfilled the Pythagorean dream in conceiving analytic
geometry and modern mathematics by synthesizing Greek geometry with Arab
algebra. |
2003-03-22S |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Those
who believe in God strictly of the basis of faith are setting themselves up
for failure for the reason that their conception of God is based on a static
snapshot that is, by definition, not subject to reason. The Devil is the one who seeks out those
who blindly follow. A true God most
certainly wants to be constantly challenged by both faith and reason. Kevin Spacey tells us in the 1996 movie The
Usual Suspects that the greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was
convincing the world he doesn’t exist.
And now we know the second greatest trick the Devil ever pulled was
convincing the world we can know God by faith alone. |
2003-07-3R |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
Totalitarianism
is the practice of governance that attempts to monopolize all possible
influences affecting the behavior of individuals. It atomizes people and existentially
alienates them from themselves and each other, thus forcing them to
capitulate to the to the external authority of government in order to
survive. Totalitarianism depends upon
the masses to control the masses by either physical or metaphysical
force. The Canadian Government defines
itself as totalitarian in that it denies the children access to the mind of
God by buggering them with a wrongheaded education that is founded on a
false, flat, dehistorized version of mathematics. |
2003-01-18S |
|
Bek,
Christopher |
William
James (1842-1910) was an American philosopher and psychologist who developed
pragmatism—the philosophy which calls for ideas and theories to be tested in
practice to assess whether claims about truth, knowledge and morality can be
verified and put to practical use.
Pragmatism embodies the American faith in practicality and the
distrust of abstract theories. Of course
the darkside of this so-called distrust of theories is that rejecting a theory
because it is a theory is easy. The
very last thing the Everyman wants is the revelation of a higher truth which
could call into question his existing beliefs. James is perhaps most famous for his
depiction of the lifecycle of a theory.
According to James, a theory is first ignored, then attached as
absurd, then admitted to be true, but obvious—and finally seen to be so
important that its adversaries claim to have discovered it themselves. |
2005-02-05S |
|
Berdyaev,
Nicholas |
Average
goodness is no longer enough. |
2002-12-03T |
|
Berkeley,
George |
All
the choir of heaven and furniture of earth—in a word all those bodies which
compose the mighty frame of the world—have not any substance without the
mind. So long as they are not
perceived by me, or do not exist in my mind or in the mind of any spirit,
they have no existence whatsoever. |
2002-06-26W |
|
Berkeley,
George |
To
be is to be perceived. |
2004-12-16R |
|
Bernstein,
Peter |
In
1654, a time when the Renaissance was in full flower, the Chevalier de Mere,
a French nobleman with a taste for both gambling and mathematics, challenged
the famed French mathematician Blaise Pascal to solve a puzzle. The question was how to divide the stakes
of unfinished game of chance between two players when one of them is
ahead. The puzzle had confounded
mathematicians since it was posed some two hundred years earlier by the monk
Luca Paccioli. This was the man who
brought double-entry bookkeeping to the attention of the business managers of
his day—and tutored Leonardo da Vinci in the multiplication tables. Pascal turned for help to Pierre de Fermat,
a lawyer who was also a brilliant mathematician. The outcome of their collaboration was
intellectual dynamite. What might
appear to have been a seventeenth-century version of the game of Trivial
Pursuit led to the discovery of the theory of probability, the mathematical
heart of the concept of risk. Their
solution to Paccioli’s puzzle meant that people could for the first time make
decisions and forecast the future with the help of mathematics. In the medieval and ancient worlds, even in
preliterate and peasant societies, people managed to make decisions, advance
their interests, and carryon trade but with no real understanding of risk or
the nature of decisionmaking. |
2003-05-16F |
|
Bernstein,
Peter |
In
1952 a young graduate student named Harry Markowitz studying operations
research demonstrated mathematically why putting all your eggs in one basket
is an unacceptable strategy and why optimal diversification is the best one
can do. His revelation touched off an
intellectual movement that has revolutionized Wall Street, corporate finance
and decisionmaking of all kinds. Its
effects are still being felt today. |
2003-05-15R |
|
Bernstein,
Peter |
Paradigm
shifts are not unpredictable, just unthinkable. |
2002-06-26W |
|
Bernstein,
Peter |
The
definition of risk is that more things can happen than will happen. |
2002-07-04R |
|
Bernstein,
Peter |
The
modern conception of risk is rooted in the Hindu-Arabic numbering system that
reached the West seven to eight hundred years ago. But the serious study of
risk began during the Renaissance, when people broke loose from the
constraints of the past and subjected long held beliefs to open challenge.
This was a time when much of the world was to be discovered and its resources
exploited. It was a time of religious
turmoil, nascent capitalism and a vigorous approach to science and the
future. |
2003-05-16F |
|
Bernstein,
Peter |
To
judge the extent to which today’s methods of dealing with risk are either a
benefit or a threat, we must know the whole story, from its very
beginnings. We must know why people of
past times did—or did not—try to tame risk, how they approached the task,
what modes of thinking and language emerged from their experience and how
their activities interacted with other events, large and small, to change the
course of culture. Such a perspective
will bring us to a deeper understanding of where we stand, and where we may
be heading. Along the way we shall
refer often to games of chance, which have applications that extend far
beyond the spin of the roulette wheel.
Many of the most sophisticated ideas about managing risk and making
decisions have developed from the analysis of the most childish of
games. One does not have to be a
gambler or even an investor to recognize what gambling and investing reveal
about risk. |
2003-05-15R |
|
Bible,
The |
A
man that hath friends must shew himself friendly: and there is a friend that
sticketh closer than a brother. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
And
God shall wipe away all tears from their eyes; and there shall be no more
death, neither sorrow, nor crying, neither shall there be any more pain: for
the former things are passed away. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
And
if I go and prepare a place for you, I will come again, and receive you unto
myself; that where I am, there ye may be also. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
And
without faith it is impossible to please God, because anyone who comes to him
must believe that he exists and that he rewards those who earnestly seek him. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
Be
not forgetful to entertain strangers for thereby some have entertained angels
unawares. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
But
when he asks, he must believe and not doubt, because he who doubts is like a
wave of the sea, blown and tossed by the wind. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
Christ
looked at them and said—With man this is impossible, but with God all things
are possible. |
2002-12-26R |
|
Bible,
The |
Come
unto me, all ye that labour and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
Delight
thyself also in the Lord; and he shall give thee the desires of thine heart. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
For
I am convinced that neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor rulers, nor
things present. nor things to come, nor anything else, in all creation, will
be able to separate us from the love of God in Christ our Lord. |
2004-12-18S |
|
Bible,
The |
For
in much wisdom is much grief, and increase of knowledge is increase of
sorrow. |
2004-12-18S |
|
Bible,
The |
For
the eyes of the Lord run to and fro throughout the whole earth, to show
himself strong in the behalf of them whose heart is perfect toward him. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
I
can do all things through Christ which strengtheneth me. |
2004-12-09R |
|
Bible,
The |
I
will lift up mine eyes unto the hills, from whence cometh my help. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
Now
faith is the assurance of things hoped for, the evidence of things not seen. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
The
appetite of the lazy craves and gets nothing, while the appetite of the
diligent is richly supplied. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
The
Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart; and saveth such as be of a
contrite spirit. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
The
path of the righteous is like the first gleam of dawn, shining ever brighter
till the full light of day. |
2003-03-06R |
|
Bible,
The |
This
one thing I do, forgetting those things which are behind and reaching forth
unto those things which are before, I press on toward the mark for the prize
of the high calling of God in Christ. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
Those
who hope in God will renew their strength. They will soar on wings like
eagles—they will run and not grow weary—they will walk and not be faint. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
Thou
wilt keep him in perfect peace whose mind is stayed on thee; because he
trusteth in thee. |
|
|
Bible,
The |
Trust
in the Lord with all your heart, And lean not on your own understanding; In
all your ways acknowledge Him, And he shall direct your paths. |
|
|
Blalock,
Jolene |
I
am a superior species. |
2002-11-26T |
|
Bohr,
Niels |
Anyone
who is not totally offended by quantum theory does not understand it. |
2002-07-08M |
|
Bohr,
Niels |
We
all agree that your theory is crazy. The question that divides us is whether
it is crazy enough. |
2003-01-28T |
|
Bohr,
Niels |
We
are both spectators and actors in the great drama of existence. |
2002-07-08M |
|
Boslough,
John |
Not
all physicists believe that a unified theory is possible. The Austrian physicist Wolfgang Pauli
(1900-58) once joked—What God has put asunder, no man shall ever join. |
2003-03-10T |
|
Boslough,
John |
Physicists
are searching for a single interaction at the heart of the universe that is
the key to all physical phenomena. |
2003-03-10T |
|
Boslough,
John |
The
universe seems to operate according to several sets of different rules that
act in layers independently of one another. |
2003-03-10T |
|
Brennan,
Richard |
Churchill
was so angry that Niels Bohr had managed to influence Roosevelt that he
demanded Bohr be arrested—but then grumpily settled for keeping Bohr and
anyone under his influence under surveillance. |
2003-07-1T |
|
Brennan,
Richard |
In
1936 the Nobel Prize-winning physicist Johannes Stark and his followers
unleashed a newspaper assault in Germany against Jewish physics, by which he
meant theoretical physics, which he contrasted with German or experimental
physics. |
2003-07-1T |
|
Brennan,
Richard |
Nobody
had shaken the world of science more than Einstein—and now came along another
young upstart German in Heisenberg with still another attack on classical physics. |
2003-07-1T |
|
Bronner, Stephen |
John
Locke and Adam Smith, Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Thomas Jefferson, Voltaire and
others envisioned a new world in which the arbitrary authority of the Church
and an arrogant aristocracy would cease to exist; a world in which reason and
democracy would temper provincial ethnic and religious hatreds between states
and races; a world of unfettered freedom, without radical differences in the
distribution of wealth, in which an individual might better his lot through hard
work and without fear of obstruction by the state. The constitution was the jewel in the crown
of this new world. The individual would be no longer an object of domination
but rather a subject vested with rights—a citizen. |
2003-05-05M |
|
Buddha,
The last words of |
Work
out your salvation with diligence. |
2002-12-15N |
|
Burke,
Edmund |
The
only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing. |
2002-12-15N |
|
Camus,
Albert |
A
world that can be explained even with bad reasons is a familiar world. But in
a universe suddenly divested of illusions and lights, man feels an alien, a
stranger. His exile is without remedy since he is deprived of the memory of a
lost home or the hope of a promised land. This divorce between man and his
life, the actor and his setting, is properly the feeling of absurdity. |
|
|
Camus,
Albert |
An
intellectual is someone whose mind watches itself. |
2002-07-05F |
|
Camus,
Albert |
I
am not interested in being a hero.
What interests me is being a man. |
2002-06-26W |
|
Camus,
Albert |
I
grew in the sea and poverty was my wealth, then I lost the sea, then all
luxury seemed grey, poverty intolerable. Since then, I wait. I wait for the return
voyage, the house by the sea, the clear light of day. I wait, I struggle to
be polite. People see me pass in elegant cultured streets, I admire the
views, I applaud like everyone else, I shake hands, it’s not really me
speaking. People praise me, I daydream a little, I’m offended, but show
almost no surprise. Then I forget and smile at whoever insults me, or I greet
those I love too courteously. What’s to be done if I can only remember a
single image? Finally they urge me to say who I am. Still nothing, still
nothing. |
2003-01-23R |
|
Camus,
Albert |
I
sometimes wonder what future historians will say of us. It seems to me a single sentence should
suffice for modern man—He fornicated and read the papers. After that vigorous definition, the subject
will be, if I may say so, exhausted. |
2003-01-13M |
|
Camus,
Albert |
I
want to be the perfect actor. |
2002-12-10T |
|
Camus,
Albert |
If
God exists, all depends on Him and we can do nothing against His will. If He does not exist, everything depends on
us. |
|
|
Camus,
Albert |
Integrity
has no need of rules. |
2004-12-21T |
|
Camus,
Albert |
Man
stands face to face with the irrational.
He feels within him his longing for happiness and for reason. The absurd
is born of this confrontation between the human need and the unreasonable
silence of the world. |
|
|
Camus,
Albert |
May
I, monsieur, offer my services without running the risk of intruding? I fear you may not be able to make yourself
understood by the worthy ape who presides over the fate of this
establishment. In fact, he speaks
nothing but Dutch. Unless you
authorize me to plead your case, he will not guess that you want gin. There, I dare hope he understood me—that
nod must mean that he yields to my arguments.
He is taking steps—indeed, he is making haste with prudent
deliberation. You are lucky—he didn’t
grunt. When he refuses to serve
someone he merely grunts. No one
insists. Being master of one’s moods
is the privilege of the larger animals.
Now I shall withdraw, monsieur, happy to have been of help to
you. Thank you—I’d accept if I were
sure of not being a nuisance. You are
too kind. Then I shall bring my glass
over beside yours. |
2002-12-26R |
|
Camus,
Albert |
Memory
is the enemy of totalitarianism. |
2003-04-30W |
|
Camus,
Albert |
My
mother died today, or maybe it was yesterday. |
2003-01-06M |
|
Camus,
Albert |
Of
whom and of what indeed can I say—I know that! This heart within me I can feel, and I
judge that it exists. This world I can
touch, and I likewise judge that it exists.
There ends all my knowledge, and the rest is construction. For if I try to seize this self of which I
feel sure, if I try to define and summarize it, it is nothing but water
slipping through my fingers. I can
sketch one by one all the aspects that it is able to assume, all those
likewise that have been attributed to it, this upbringing, this origin, this
ardor of these silences, this nobility or this vileness. But aspects cannot be added up. This very heart which is mine will forever
remain undefinable to me. Between the
certainty I have of my existence and the content I try to give to that assurance,
the gap will never be filled. Forever
I shall be a stranger to myself. In
psychology as in logic, there are truths but no truth. Socrates’ Know thyself has as much
value as the Be virtuous of our confessionals. They reveal a nostalgia at the same time as
an ignorance. They are sterile
exercises on great subjects. They are
legitimate insofar as they are approximate. |
2002-12-10T |
|
Camus,
Albert |
One
recognizes one’s course by the paths that stray from it. |
2002-07-04R |
|
Camus,
Albert |
The
absurdist method, like that of systematic doubt, has wiped the slate clean.
It leaves us in a blind alley. But, like the method of doubt, it can, by returning
upon itself, disclose a new field of investigation. Reasoning follows the
same reflexive course. I proclaim that I believe in nothing and that
everything is absurd, but I cannot doubt the validity of my own proclamation
and I am compelled to believe, at least, in my own protest. The first, and
only, datum that is furnished me, within absurdist experience, is rebellion. |
|
|
Camus,
Albert |
The
actor teaches us that there is no frontier between being and appearing. |
|
|
Camus,
Albert |
The
certainty of a God giving a meaning to life far surpasses in attractiveness
the ability to behave badly with impunity. The choice would not be hard to
make. But there is no choice and that is where the bitterness comes in. The
absurd does not liberate; it binds. It does not authorize all actions.
Everything is permitted does not mean that nothing is forbidden. The absurd
merely confers an equivalence on the consequences of those actions. |
2005-05-08N |
|
Camus,
Albert |
The
fate Sisyphus belongs to him. His rock is his thing. Likewise, the absurd
man, when he contemplates his torment, silences all the idols. In the
universe suddenly restored to its silence, the myriad wondering little voices
of the earth rise up. Unconscious, secret calls, invitations from all the
faces, they are the necessary reverse and price of victory. There is no sun
without shadow, and it is essential to know the night. The absurd man says
yes and his effort will henceforth be unceasing. |
2004-12-18S |
|
Camus,
Albert |
The
final conclusion of the absurdist process is, in fact, the rejection of
suicide and persistence in that hopeless encounter between human questioning
and the silence of the universe. Suicide would mean the end of this
encounter, and the absurdist position realizes that it could not endorse
suicide without abolishing its own foundations. It would consider such an
outcome running away or being rescued. But it is plain that absurdist
reasoning thereby recognizes human life as the single necessary good, because
it makes possible that confrontation, and because without life the absurdist
wager could not go on. To say that life is absurd, one must be alive. How can
one, without indulging one’s desire for comfort, keep for oneself the
exclusive benefits of this argument? The moment life is recognized as a
necessary good, it becomes so for all men. One cannot find logical
consistency in murder, if one denies it in suicide. |
2005-05-28S |
|
Camus,
Albert |
The
only true philosophical question is that of suicide. |
2002-12-10T |
|
Camus,
Albert |
The
sense of the absurd, when one first undertakes to deduce a rule of action
from it, makes murder seem a matter of indifference, hence, permissible. If
one believes in nothing, if nothing makes sense, if we can assert no value
whatsoever, everything is permissible and nothing is important. There is no
pro or con; the murderer is neither right nor wrong. One is free to stoke the
crematory fires, or to give one’s life to the care of lepers. Wickedness and
virtue are just accident or whim. |
2005-05-08N |
|
Camus,
Albert |
To
an absurd mind reason is useless and there is nothing beyond reason. The
absurd is lucid reason noting its limits. I don’t know whether this world has
a meaning that transcends it. But I know that I do not know that meaning and
that it is impossible for me just now to know it. What can a meaning outside
my condition mean to me? I can understand it only in human terms. |
|
|
Camus,
Albert |
We
may then decide not to act at all, which comes down to condoning other
people’s murder, plus a little fastidious sorrow over human imperfection. Or
we may hit upon tragic dilettantism as a substitute for action; in this case,
human lives become counters in a game. Finally, we may resolve to undertake
some action that is not wholly arbitrary. In this case, since we have no
higher value to direct our action, we shall aim at efficiency. Since
nothing is true or false, good or bad, our principle will become that of
showing ourselves to be the most effective, in other words the most powerful.
And then the world will no longer be divided into the just and the unjust,
but into masters and slaves. Thus, whichever way we turn in the depths of
negation and nihilism, murder has its privileged position. |
|
|
Camus,
Albert |
What
is a rebel? A man who says no—but whose refusal does not imply a
renunciation. He is also a man who says yes as soon as he begins to think for
himself. He rebels because he categorically refuses to submit to conditions
that he considers intolerable and also because he is confusedly convinced
that his position is justified, or rather, because in his own mind he thinks
that he has the right to. |
2003-02-22S |
|
Camus,
Albert |
When
man submits God to moral judgment, he kills Him in his own heart. And then
what is the basis of morality? God is denied in the name of justice but can
the idea of justice be understood without the idea of God? Have we not
arrived at absurdity? It is absurdity that Nietzsche meets face to face. The
better to avoid it, he pushes it to extremities—morality is the final aspect
of God which must be destroyed before the period of reconstruction begins.
Then God no longer exists and no longer guarantees our existence; man, in
order to exist, must decide to act. |
2005-05-08N |
|
Camus,
Albert |
When
one has no character, one has to apply a method. |
2002-12-10T |
|
Camus,
Albert |
When
war breaks out people say its stupid and cannot last long. But being stupid does not prevent it from
lasting. Stupidity has a knack of
getting its way, which we would see if we were not always so wrapped up in
ourselves. |
2003-02-22S |
|
Canadian
Government |
Knowledge
le savior. (as depicted on the 2000 two-dollar coin) |
2002-09-16M |
|
Carlyle,
Thomas |
History
is the biography of great men. |
2002-12-03T |
|
Carlyle,
Thomas |
What
is philosophy but a constant battle against tradition? |
2002-12-15N |
|
Carroll,
Lewis |
The
time has come, the Walrus said, to speak of many things. |
2002-12-15N |
|
Chesterton,
GK |
The
primary objective of education is not to learn things—but to unlearn things. |
2003-05-18N |
|
Chrétien,
Canadian Prime Minister Jean |
I've
never tried marijuana. I don't even
know what it smells like. |
2003-01-23R |
|
Christ |
I
will lead the blind by a road they do not know, by paths they have not known
I will guide them, I will turn the darkness before them into light, the rough
places into level ground. These are the things I will do, I will not forsake
them. |
2003-03-06R |
|
Christ |
No
one goes to God who does not go through me. |
2003-06-16M |
|
Christ |
The
number of times a person should be forgiven is seven times seventy. |
2002-07-05F |
|
Christ,
King |
In
exercising the Divine Right of Kings, I, Christopher Lloyd Bek, acting under
the legitimate agency of God and having demonstrated my morally superiority,
lawfully and rightfully claim My Kingship and sole Sovereignship to the
Sovereignty of Canada. May anyone who
morally stands against me speak now or forever hold your peace. As the King
of Canada, I will hold no political power, will walk among the people, and
will be above the manmade laws of government.
I answer only to God, but will endeavor to respect the salient manmade
laws of government—28 September 2002. |
|
|
Churchill,
Winston |
We
are shaping the world faster than we can change ourselves, and we are
applying to the present the habits of the past. |
2003-03-06R |
|
Clinton,
William |
If
this discovery is confirmed, it will surely be one of the most stunning
insights into our universe that science has ever uncovered. Its implications are as far-reaching and
awe-inspiring as can be imagined. Even
as it promises answers to some of our oldest questions, it poses others even
more fundamental. We will continue to
listen closely to what it has to say as we continue the search for answers
and for knowledge that is as old as humanity itself, but essential to our
people’s future. |
2003-06-04W |
|
—Concluding
paragraph from The Universe and Dr. Einstein (1948) by Lincoln Barnett |
In
the evolution of scientific thought, one fact has become impressively
clear—that there is no mystery of the physical world which does not point to
a mystery beyond itself. All highroads
of the intellect, all byways of theory and conjecture lead ultimately to an
abyss that human ingenuity can never span.
For man is enchained by the very condition of his Being, his
finiteness and his involvement in nature.
The further he extends his horizons, the more vividly he recognizes
the fact that, as the physicist Niels Bohr put it, we are both spectators and
actors in the great drama of existence.
Man is thus his own greatest mystery.
He does not understand the vast veiled universe into which he has been
cast for the reason that he does not understand himself. He comprehends little of his organic
process and even less of his unique capacity to perceive the world about him
in his rationality and his dreams.
Least of all does he understand his noblest and most mysterious
faculty—the ability to transcend himself by perceiving himself in the act of
perception. Man’s inescapable impasse
is that he himself is part of the world that he seeks to explore—his body and
proud brain are but mosaics of the same elemental particles that compose the
dark, drifting clouds of interstellar space.
Man is, in the final analysis, merely an ephemeral confirmation of the
primordial spacetime field. Standing
midway between macrocosm and microcosm, he finds barriers on every side and
can perhaps but marvel, as Saint Paul did nineteen hundred years ago in
saying that the world was created by the word of God so that what is seen is
composed of things which do not appear. |
2003-02-25T |
|
Coward,
Noel |
I’ve
over-educated myself in all the things I shouldn’t have known at all. |
|
|
Davis,
Geena from the 1991 movie Thelma and Louise |
Something
has crossed over in me. |
2002-12-29N |
|
Davis,
Geena—the last words from the 1991 movie Thelma and Louise |
Go. |
2002-12-29N |
|
Delacroix,
Eugène |
Genius
is merely the art of generalizing and choosing. |
2003-05-14W |
|
Democritus |
Bitter
and sweet, warm and cold, as well as all the colors—all of these things exist
in opinion and not in reality. What
really exist are unchangeable particles or atoms and their motion in empty
space. |
2004-12-21T |
|
Descartes,
René |
And
indeed it is no surprise that God, in creating me, should have placed this
idea in me to be, as it were, the mark of the craftsman stamped on his work—not
that the mark need be anything distinct from the work itself. But the mere
fact that God created me is a very strong basis for believing that I am
somehow made in his image and likeness, and that I perceive that likeness,
which includes the idea of God, by the same faculty which enables me to
perceive myself. |
2004-12-21T |
|
Descartes,
René |
Aristotle’s
most enthusiastic contemporary followers have an interest in my refraining
from publishing the principles of the philosophy I use. For my principles are
so very simple and evident that in publishing them I should, as it were, be
opening windows and admitting daylight into that cellar where they have gone
down to fight. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
As
to the fact that there can be nothing in the mind, in so far as it is a
thinking thing, of which it is not aware, this seems to me to be
self-evident. For there is nothing that we can understand to be in the mind, regarded
in this way, that is not a thought or dependent on a thought. In view of this
I do not doubt that the mind begins to think as soon as it is implanted in
the body of an infant. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
At
that time I was in Germany, where I had been called by the wars that are not
yet ended there. While I was returning to the army from the coronation of the
Emperor, the onset of winter detained me in quarters where, finding no
conversation to divert me and fortunately having no cares or passions to
trouble me, I stayed all day shut up alone in a stoveheated room, where I
was completely free to converse with myself about my own thoughts. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
But
immediately I noticed that while I was trying thus to think everything false,
it was necessary that I, who was thinking this, was something. And observing
that this truth I am thinking, therefore I exist was so firm and sure that
all the most extravagant suppositions of the skeptics were incapable of
shaking it, I decided that I could accept it without scruple as the first
principle of the philosophy I was seeking. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
But
there is a deceiver of supreme power and cunning who is deliberately and
constantly deceiving me. In that case I too undoubtedly exist, if he is deceiving
me; and let him deceive me as much as he can, he will never bring it about
that I am nothing so long as I think that I am something. So after
considering everything very thoroughly, I must finally conclude that this
proposition—I think, therefore I exist—is necessarily true whenever it is put
forward by me or conceived in my mind. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
Conquer
yourself rather than the world. |
2003-05-18N |
|
Descartes,
René |
Good
sense is the best distributed thing in the world—for everyone thinks himself
so well endowed with it that even those who are the hardest to please in
everything else do not usually desire more of it than they possess. In this it is unlikely that everyone is
mistaken. It indicates rather that the
power of judging well and of distinguishing the true from the false—which is
what we properly call good sense or human reason—is naturally equal in all
men. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
How
often, asleep at night, am I convinced of just such familiar events that I am
here in my dressing-gown, sitting by the fire—when in fact I am lying
undressed in bed. As I think about this more carefully, I see plainly that
there are never any sure signs by means of which being awake can be
distinguished from being asleep. The result is that I begin to feel dazed,
and this very feeling only reinforces the notion that I may be asleep. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
I
do my best thinking in a warm bed. |
2003-05-14W |
|
Descartes,
René |
I
have noticed certain laws which God has so established in nature, and of
which he has implanted such notions in our minds, that after adequate reflection
we cannot doubt that they are exactly observed in everything which exists or
occurs in the world. |
2002-12-16M |
|
Descartes,
René |
I
understand the term idea to mean the form of any given thought, immediate
perception of which makes me aware of the thought. Hence, whenever I express
something in words, and understand what I am saying, this very fact makes it
certain that there is within me an idea of what is signified by the words in
question. |
2002-12-16M |
|
Descartes,
René |
I
will suppose therefore that not God, who is supremely good and the source of
truth, but rather some malicious demon of the utmost power and cunning has
employed all his energies in order to deceive me. I shall think that the sky,
the air, the earth, colours, shapes, sounds and all external things are
merely the delusions of dreams which he has devised to ensnare my judgment. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
If
I simply refrain from making a judgment in cases where I do not perceive the
truth with sufficient clarity and distinctness, then it is clear that I am
behaving correctly and avoiding error. But if in such cases I either affirm
or deny, then I am not using my free will correctly. In this incorrect use of
free will may be found the privation which constitutes the essence of error. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
If
the sense of hearing transmitted to our mind the true image of its object
then, instead of making us conceive the sound, it would have to make us
conceive the motion of the parts of the air which is then vibrating against
our ears. Everyone knows that the ideas of tickling and of pain, which are
formed in our mind on the occasion of our being touched by external bodies,
bear no resemblance to these bodies. Suppose we pass a feather gently over
the lips of a child who is falling asleep, and he feels himself being
tickled. Do you think the idea of tickling which he conceives resembles
anything present in this feather? I see no reason which compels us to believe
that what it is in objects that gives rise to the sensation of light is any
more like this sensation than the actions of a feather are like a tickling
sensation. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
In
the bodies we call colored the colors are nothing other than the various ways
in which the bodies receive light and reflect it against our eyes. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
It
does not seem to me that the human mind is capable of conceiving at the same
time the distinction and the union between body and soul, because for this it
is necessary to conceive them as a single thing and at the same time to
conceive them as two things; and this is absurd. Everyone feels that he is a
single person with both body and thought so related by nature that the
thought can move the body and feel the things which happen to it. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
It
is quite evident that existence can no more be separated from the essence of
God than the fact that its three angles equal two right angles can be
separated from the idea of a triangle, or than the idea of a mountain can be
separated from the idea of a valley. Hence it is just as much of a
contradiction to think of God (that is, a supremely perfect being) lacking
existence (that is, lacking a perfection), as it is to think of a mountain
without a valley. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
Make
a simple set of rules and follow them. |
2003-03-08S |
|
Descartes,
René |
Nature
likewise teaches me by these sensations of pain, hunger, thirst, etc., that I
am not only lodged in my body as a pilot in a vessel, but that I am besides
so intimately conjoined, and as it were intermixed with it, that my mind and
body compose a certain unity. For if this were not the case, I should not
feel pain when my body is hurt, seeing I am merely a thinking thing, but
should perceive the wound by the understanding alone, just as a pilot
perceives by sight when any part of his vessel is damaged; and when my body
has need of food or drink, I should have a clear knowledge of this, and not
be made aware of it by the confused sensations of hunger and thirst: for, in
truth, all these sensations of hunger, thirst, pain, etc., are nothing more
than certain confused modes of thinking, arising from the union and apparent
fusion of mind and body. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
Next
I examined attentively what I was. I saw that while I could pretend that I
had no body and that there was no world and no place for me to be in, I could
not for all that pretend that I did not exist. From this I knew I was a
substance whose whole essence or nature is to think, and which does not require
any place, or depend on any material thing, in order to exist. Accordingly
this I—that is, the soul by which I am what I am—is entirely distinct from
the body, and indeed is easier to know than the body, and would not fail to
be whatever it is, even if the body did not exist. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
No
beauty is comparable to the beauty of truth. |
2003-06-20F |
|
Descartes,
René |
Now
it is manifest by the natural light that there must be at least as much reality
in the efficient and total cause as in the effect of that cause. For where, I
ask, could the effect get its reality from, if not from the cause? And how
could the cause give it to the effect unless it possessed it? |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
On
the one hand I have a clear and distinct idea of myself, in so far as I am
simply a thinking non-extended thing; and on the other hand I have a distinct
idea of body, in so far as this is simply an extended, non-thinking thing.
And accordingly, it is certain that I am really distinct from my body, and
can exist without it. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
Since
I sometimes believe that others go astray in cases where they think they have
the most perfect knowledge, how do I know that God has not brought it about
that I go wrong every time I add two and three or count the sides of a
square? |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
So
what was it in the wax that I understood with such distinctness? Evidently
none of the features which I arrived at by means of the senses; for whatever
came under taste, smell, sight, touch or hearing has now altered—yet the wax
remains. But what is this wax which is perceived by the mind alone? It is of
course the same wax which I see, which I touch, which I picture in my
imagination, in short the same wax which I thought it to be from the start.
And yet, and here is the point, the perception I have of it is a case not of
vision or touch or imagination nor has it ever been, despite previous
appearances—but of purely mental scrutiny. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
Some
years ago I was struck by the large number of falsehoods that I had accepted
as true in my childhood, and by the highly doubtful nature of the whole
edifice that I had subsequently based on them. I realized that it was
necessary, once in the course of my life, to demolish everything completely
and start again right from the foundations if I wanted to establish anything
at all in the sciences that was stable and likely to last. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
The
first rule is never to accept anything as true if I did not have evident
knowledge of its truth—that is, carefully to avoid precipitate conclusions
and preconceptions, and to include nothing more in my judgments than what
presented itself to my mind so clearly and so distinctly that I had no
occasion to call it into doubt. The second, to divide each of the
difficulties I examined into as many parts as possible and as may be required
in order to resolve them better. The third, to direct my thoughts in an
orderly manner, by beginning with the simplest and most easily known objects
in order to ascend little by little, step by step, to knowledge of the most
complex, and by supposing some order even among objects that have no natural
order of precedence. And the last, throughout to make enumerations so complete,
and reviews so comprehensive, that I could be sure of leaving nothing out. |
2003-05-14W |
|
Descartes,
René |
The
nature of matter, or body considered in general, consists not in its being
something which is hard or heavy or colored, or which affects the senses in
any way, but simply in its being something which is extended in length,
breadth and depth. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
There
are two facts about the human soul on which depend all things we know of its
nature. The first is that it thinks; the second is that it is united to the
body and can act and be acted upon along with it. About the second I have
said hardly anything. |
2002-12-16M |
|
Descartes,
René |
There
is a great difference between the mind and the body, inasmuch as the body is
by its very nature always divisible, while the mind is utterly indivisible.
For when I consider the mind, or myself in so far as I am merely a thinking
thing, I am unable to distinguish any parts within myself; I understand
myself to be something quite single and complete. By contrast, there is no
corporeal or extended thing that I can think of which in my thought I cannot
easily divide into parts; and this very fact makes me understand that it is
divisible. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
This
will not seem at all strange to those who know how many kinds of automatons,
or moving machines, the skill of man can construct with the use of very few
parts, in comparison with the great multitude of bones, muscles, nerves,
arteries, veins and all the other parts that are in the body of any animal.
For they will regard this body as a machine which, having been made by the
hand of God, is incomparably better ordered than any machine that can be
devised by man, and contains in itself movements more wonderful than those in
any such machine. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
Those
long chains composed of very simple and easy reasonings, which geometers
customarily use to arrive at their most difficult demonstrations, had given
me occasion to suppose that all the things which come within the scope of
human knowledge are interconnected in the same way. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
Thought.
I use this term to include everything that is within us in such a way that we
are immediately aware of it. Thus all the operations of the will, the
intellect, the imagination and the senses are thoughts. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
Thought:
this alone is inseparable from me. I am, I exist—that is certain. But for how
long? For as long as I am thinking. For it could be that were I totally to
cease from thinking, I should totally cease to exist. At present I am not
admitting anything except what is necessarily true. I am, then, in the strict
sense only a thing that thinks; that is, I am a mind, or intelligence, or
intellect, or reason—words whose meaning I have been ignorant of until now.
But for all that I am a thing which is real and which truly exists. But what
kind of thing? As I have just said—a thinking thing. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
What
then am I? A thing that thinks. What is that? A thing that doubts,
understands, affirms, denies, is willing, is unwilling, and also imagines and
has sensory perceptions. |
2002-12-16M |
|
Descartes,
René |
When
I said that we can know nothing for certain until we are aware that God
exists, I expressly declared that I was speaking only of knowledge of those
conclusions which can be recalled when we are no longer attending to the
arguments by means of which we deduced them. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
When
we become aware that we are thinking things, this is a primary notion which
is not derived by means of any syllogism. When someone says I think,
therefore I exist, he does not deduce existence from thought by means of a
syllogism, but recognizes it as something self-evident by a simple intuition
of the mind. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
When
we know how much the beasts differ from us, we understand much better the
arguments which prove that our soul is of a nature entirely independent of
the body, and consequently that it is not bound to die with it. And since we
cannot see any other causes which destroy the soul, we are naturally led to
conclude that it is immortal. |
|
|
Descartes,
René |
Whereas
reason is a universal instrument which can be used in all kinds of
situations, bodily organs need some particular disposition for each particular
action; hence it is for all practical purposes impossible for a machine to
have enough different organs to make it act in all the contingencies of life
in the way in which our reason makes us act. This shows not merely that the
beasts have less reason than men, but that they have no reason at all. |
|
|
Devil,
The |
Better
the devil you know than the devil you don’t know. |
2002-12-24T |
|
Dirac,
Paul |
It
is more important to have beautiful theories and equations than to have them
fit the data. |
2004-12-21T |
|
Dirac,
Paul |
Quantum
theory explains most of physics and all of chemistry. |
2003-07-1T |
|
Dossey,
Larry |
Recovering
the nonlocal nature of the mind is essentially recovering the soul. |
|
|
Dowbiggin,
Bruce |
In
the French language a crowd is known as a foule. After watching the
booing boors at the Bell Centre in Montreal on Thursday 20 March 2003, I’d
have to say the etymologists at the Acadmie Française got it just about
right. Sticking your finger in the eye of your closest neighbour and friend
in his time of crisis is the work of fools. For a nation like Canada where
second-guessing comes in a close second to hockey as the national pastime,
these smug outbursts are becoming commonplace. And the recent acid-etched
words of Liberal cabinet ministers and backbenchers in the House of Commons
describing Americans as bastards gives a whole new meaning to the term foule.
|
2003-03-22S |
|
Durant,
Will |
Democracy
means drift; it means permission given to each part of an organism to do just
what it pleases; it means the lapse of coherence and interdependence, the
enthronement of liberty and chaos. It means the worship of mediocrity and the
hatred of excellence. It means the impossibility of great men—how could great
men submit to the indignities and indecencies of an election? What chance
would they have? What is hated by the people, as a wolf by the dogs, is the
free spirit, the enemy of all fetters, the not-adorer, the man who is not a
regular party-member. How can the superman arise in such a soil? And how can
a nation become great when its greatest men lie unused, discouraged, perhaps
unknown? Such a society loses character; imitation is horizontal instead of
vertical—not the superior man but the majority man becomes the ideal and the
model; everybody comes to resemble everybody else; even the sexes
approximate—the men become women and the women become men. |
2005-05-28S |
|
Durant,
Will |
Let
our students of philosophy enter the world with no favor shown them; they
shall compete with men of brawn and men of cunning; in the mart of strife
they shall learn from the book of life itself; they shall hurt their fingers
and scratch their philosophic shins on the crude realities of the world; they
shall earn their bread and butter by the sweat of their brows. This last and
sharpest test shall go on ruthlessly for fifteen long years. Those that
survive, scarred and fifty, sobered and self-reliant, shorn of scholastic
vanity by the merciless friction of life, and armed now with all the wisdom
that tradition and experience, culture and conflict, can cooperate to
give—these men at last shall become our leaders. |
2003-03-06R |
|
Durant,
Will |
The
problem of politics is to prevent the businessman from ruling. For such a man
has the short sight and narrow grasp of a politician, not the long view and
wide range of the born aristocrat trained to statesmanship. The finer man has
a divine right to rule—ie. the right of superior ability. The simple man has
his place, but it is not on the throne. In his place the simple man is happy,
and his virtues are as necessary to society as those of the leader—it would
be absolutely unworthy a deeper mind to consider mediocrity in itself as an
objection. Industriousness, thrift, regularity, moderation, strong
conviction—with such virtues the mediocre man becomes perfect, but perfect
only as an instrument. A high civilization is a pyramid; it can stand only
upon a broad base; its prerequisite is a strongly and soundly consolidated
mediocrity. Always and everywhere, some will be leaders and some followers;
the majority will be compelled, and will be happy, to work under the
intellectual direction of higher men. |
2005-05-28S |
|
Durant,
Will |
Too
long have we been fragments, shattered pieces of what might be a whole. How
can a great culture grow in an air of patriotic prejudice and narrowing
provincialism? The time for petty politics is over—the compulsion to great
politics has come. When will the new race of leaders appear? |
2005-05-28S |
|
Dyson,
Freeman |
An
electron is an active agent making conscious choices. |
2002-11-20W |
|
Ecclesiastes
8:9 |
Where
the word of a King is—there is power. |
2003-01-17F |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
An
empty stomach tends not to be a very good political advisor. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Commonsense
is nothing more than the collection of prejudices acquired by the age of
eighteen. |
2002-07-05F |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Concern
for man himself and his fate must always be the chief interest of all
technical endeavors so that the creations of our mind shall become blessings
and not a curses to mankind. Never
forget this in the midst of your diagrams and equations. |
2003-06-28S |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Does
the moon really exist when no one is looking at it? |
2003-01-07T |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Few
are those who see with their own eyes and feel with their own hearts. |
2002-12-23M |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
God
is the sum total of the laws of nature. |
2002-06-28F |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Great
spirits are always encountered violent opposition from mediocre minds. |
2003-01-11S |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
I
don’t know with what weapons World War III will be fought—but World War IV
will be fought with sticks and stones. |
2002-12-23M |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
I
should not want to be forced into abandoning strict causality without fending
it more strongly than I have so far. I find the idea quite intolerable that an
electron exposed to radiation should choose of its own free will, not only
its moment to jump off, but also its direction. In that case I would rather
be a cobbler, or even an employee in a gaming house, than a physicist. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
I
want to know God’s thoughts. The rest
are details. |
2003-01-08W |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
In
so far as the statements of geometry speak about reality, they are not
certain, and in so far as they are certain, they do not speak about reality. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
In
the middle of difficulty lies opportunity. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
It
is enough for me to contemplate the mystery of conscious life, perpetuating
itself through all eternity; to reflect upon the marvelous structure of the
Universe; and to try humbly to comprehend even an infinitesimal part of the
intelligence manifested in nature. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
My
religion consists of a humble admiration of the illimitable superior spirit
who reveals Himself in the slight details that we are able to perceive with
our frail and feeble minds. That deeply emotional conviction of the presence
of a superior reasoning power, which is revealed in the incomprehensible
universe, forms my idea of God. |
2003-03-13R |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
No
problem was ever solved by the same mind that created it. |
2005-02-05S |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
No
problem was ever solved by the same mind that created it. |
2003-01-08W |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
One
may well say the eternal mystery of the world is its comprehensibility. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Only
daring speculation can lead us further—and not simply the accumulation of
facts. |
2003-01-07T |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Quantum
mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me at it is not yet
the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any
closer to the secret of the old one. I, at any rate, am convinced that He is
not playing dice. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Restricting
a body of knowledge to a small group deadens the philosophical spirit of a
people and leads to spiritual poverty. |
2005-09-15R |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Restricting
a body of knowledge to a small group deadens the philosophical spirit of a
people and leads to spiritual poverty. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Restricting
knowledge to a small group of people leads to spiritual poverty. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Science
without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Space
and time are forms of intuition that can be no more divorced from
consciousness than our concepts of color, shape and size. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
The
cosmic religious experience is the strongest and noblest mainspring of
scientific research. |
2003-03-16N |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
The
grand aim of all science is to cover the greatest number of empirical facts
by logical deduction from the smallest possible number of hypotheses or
axioms. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
The
idea that there are two structures of space independent of each other, the
metric—gravitational and the electromagnetic, is intolerable to the
theoretical spirit. |
2003-10-28T |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
The
important thing is to not stop questioning. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
The
lack of definiteness which, from the point of view of empirical importance
adheres to the notion of time in classical mechanics, was veiled by the
axiomatic representations of space and time as things given independent of
the senses. Such use of notions—independent of the empirical basis to which
they owe their existence—does not necessarily damage science. One may,
however, easily be led into the error of believing that these notions, whose
origin is forgotten, are necessary and unalterable accompaniments of our
thinking, and this error may constitute a serious danger to the progress of
science. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
The
most beautiful and most profound emotion we can experience is the sensation
of the mystical. It is the sower of
all true science. He to whom this
emotion is a stranger, who can no longer wonder and stand rapt in awe, is as
good as dead. To know that what is
impenetrable to us really exists, manifesting itself as the highest wisdom
and the most radiant beauty which our dull faculties can comprehend only in
their most primitive forms—this knowledge, this feeling is at the center of
true religiousness. |
2003-10-28T |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
The
one thing that I have learned in a long life is that all science measured
against reality is primitive and childlike—and yet it is the most precious
thing we have. |
2003-06-28S |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
The
whole of science is nothing more than a refinement of everyday thinking. |
2002-12-26R |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
There
is no more commonplace statement to make than the world in which we live is a
four-dimensional spacetime continuum. |
|
|
Einstein,
Albert |
This
is so simple that God could not have passed it up. |
2003-03-09N |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
When
the solution is simple, God has answered. |
2002-12-23M |
|
Einstein,
Albert |
Where
the world ceases to be the scene of our personal hopes and wishes, where we
face it as free beings admiring, asking and observing—we can then say that we
have entered the realm of art and science. |
|
|
Eliot,
T.S. |
Man
cannot bear very much reality at all—and it is doubtful whether he can even
bear the reality of being told so. |
2002-12-23M |
|
Eliot,
T.S. |
No
poet, no artist of any art, has his complete meaning alone. His significance,
his appreciation is the appreciation of his relation to the dead poets and
artists. You cannot value him alone; you must set him, for contrast and
comparison, among the dead. I mean this as a principle of aesthetic, not
merely historical, criticism. The necessity that he shall conform, that he
shall cohere, is not one-sided; what happens when a new work of art is
created is something that happens simultaneously to all the works of art
which preceded it. The existing monuments form an ideal order among
themselves, which is modified by the introduction of the new work of art
among them. |
|
|
Eliot,
TS |
Humankind
cannot bear very much reality—and it is doubtful whether they can even bear
the reality of being told so. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
Beware
when the great God lets loose a thinker on this planet. Then all things are
at risk. It will be as if a conflagration has broken out in a great city—and
no man knows what is safe or where it will end. |
2002-12-22N |
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
Finish
each day and be done with it. You have done what you could; some blunders and
absurdities have crept in; forget them as soon as you can. Tomorrow is a new
day; you shall begin it serenely and with too high a spirit to be encumbered
with your old nonsense. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
Hitch
your wagon to a star. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
Intellect
annuls fate. So long as a man thinks
he is free. |
2002-12-25W |
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
Is
not marriage an open question, when it is alleged, from the beginning of the
world, that such as are in the institution wish to get out, and such as are
out wish to get in? |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
It
was a high counsel that I once heard given to a young person, Always do what
you are afraid to do. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
Men
are what their mothers made them. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
People
only see what they are prepared to see. |
2002-06-28F |
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
The
end of the human race will be that it will eventually die of civilization. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
The
glory of friendship is not the outstretched hand, nor the kindly smile, nor
the joy of companionship; it is the spiritual inspiration that comes to one
when he discovers that someone else believes in him and is willing to trust
him with his friendship. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
The
happiest man is he who learns from nature the lesson of worship. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
The
less a man thinks or knows about his virtues, the better we like him. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
The
only reward of virtue is virtue. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
The
only way to have a friend is to be one. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
The
reward of a thing well done is to have done it. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
The
secret of education is respecting the pupil. |
|
|
Emerson,
Ralph Waldo |
We
but half express ourselves, and are ashamed of that divine idea which each of
us represents. |
|
|
Flew,
Anthony |
To
be illogical is to be stupid or to be incoherent or to be insufficiently
concerned with the truth—or all three together. |
2003-03-28F |
|
Flew,
Anthony |
To
be illogical is to be stupid or to be incoherent or to be insufficiently
concerned with the truth—or all three together. |
2003-03-16N |
|
Ford,
Henry |
Never
ask of another person what you have not already done yourself. |
2002-07-03W |
|
Freeloader,
Freddie |
If
you hear hoofbeats, don’t think zebras. |
2003-01-13M |
|
Freud,
Sigmund |
This
alone I know with certainty, namely that the moral judgment of man is
absolutely guided by his desire for happiness—and is therefore merely an
attempt to bolster his delusions with arguments. |
2003-01-22W |
|
Frost,
Robert |
We
dance around in a ring and suppose while the secret sits in the middle and
knows. |
2003-05-18N |
|
Galileo |
Color,
taste, smell and sound can no more be ascribed to the external objects than
can the tickling or the pain caused sometimes by touching such objects. |
|
|
Galileo |
Dumb
idiots. |
|
|
Galileo |
Sense
qualities like color, taste, smell and sound can be no more ascribed to the
external objects than the tickling or pain caused by touching such objects. |
|
|
Gamow,
George |
In
characterizing Planck’s constant—it is as if we are able to drink a pint of
beer or no beer at all. Nature
strictly prohibits us from drinking any quantity in between. |
2002-07-04R |
|
Gardiner,
Martin |
If
the reader wonders why my book does not include a chapter on the
philosophical consequences of relativity, it is because I am firmly persuaded
that in the ordinary sense of the word philosophical—relativity has no
consequences. As far as the great
traditional topics of philosophy are concerned—God, immortality, free will,
good and evil, and so on—relativity has absolutely nothing whatsoever to say. |
2002-07-05F |
|
Garner,
Jennifer |
I
want to be the perfect agent. I am the perfect agent. I am the perfect actor. |
2002-12-11W |
|
Gell-Man,
Murray |
If
I have seen farther than others, it is because I am surrounded by dwarfs. |
2002-07-03W |
|
God |
Thou
shall have no other god before me. |
2003-03-04T |
|
God |
Thou
shall have no other god before me. |
2002-12-24T |
|
God |
You
have failed me. |
2002-12-29N |
|
Goethe,
Johann (the last words) |
More
light. |
|
|
Goethe,
Johann —the last words |
More
light. |
2003-03-04T |
Gribbin,
John |
All
of chemistry can be explained by the physics of the 1930s—and a very simple
model is enough to give an insight into why atoms join together to make
molecules in the way they do. We don’t need to worry about neutrinos or
strong and weak forces. We certainly
don’t have to worry about gravity, which is far too weak to be important in
chemical reactions. And we don’t need
to worry about wave-particle duality.
We scarcely need to worry about the fact that the nucleus of an atom
is made up of two different kinds of particle—the proton and the
neutron. All we need to know to in
explaining basic chemistry is that atoms are made up of negatively charged
electrons arranged in accordance with the rules of quantum physics at some
distance from the positively charged nucleus and are under the influence of
electromagnetic forces. The basics of
chemistry are incredibly simple—but the complexity of the molecules that can
be built from the basic simple rules is astonishing. |
2004-12-09R |
|
Gribbin,
John |
The
fate of specialists in anyone area of science is to focus more and more
narrowly on their special topic, learning more and more about less and less,
until eventually they end up knowing everything about nothing. |
2003-06-27F |
|
Griswold,
Whitney |
In
the long run of history, the censor and the inquisitor have always lost. The
only sure weapon against bad ideas is better ideas. The source of better
ideas is wisdom. The surest path to wisdom is a liberal education. |
|
|
Grof,
Stanislav |
We
are approaching the time of a major paradigm shift. |
2002-12-07S |
|
Grossman,
Marcel |
It
is a wonderful feeling to recognize the unifying features of a complex
phenomena which present themselves as quite unconnected to the direct
experience of the senses. |
2005-09-15R |
|
Guiterman,
Michael |
He
who learns by finding out has sevenfold the knowledge of he who learns by
being told. |
2003-08-08F |
|
Hall,
Calvin |
While
nineteenth-century psychology was busy at work analyzing the conscious mind,
psychoanalysis was engaged in explorations of the unconscious mind. Freud felt that consciousness was only a
thin slice of the total mind, that like an iceberg, the larger part of it
existed below the surface of awareness.
Psychologists answered Freud by saying that the notion of an
unconscious mind was a contradiction in terms; the mind, by definition, was
conscious. The controversy never
reached a final conclusion because both psychology and psychoanalysis changed
their objective during the twentieth century.
Psychology became the science of behavior and psychoanalysis became
the science of personality. |
2003-06-16M |
|
Hall,
Calvin |
While
nineteenth-century psychology was busy at work analyzing the conscious mind,
psychoanalysis was engaged in explorations of the unconscious mind. Freud felt that consciousness was only a
thin slice of the total mind, that like an iceberg, the larger part of it
existed below the surface of awareness.
Psychologists answered Freud by saying that the notion of an
unconscious mind was a contradiction in terms; the mind, by definition, was
conscious. The controversy never
reached a final conclusion because both psychology and psychoanalysis changed
their objective during the twentieth century.
Psychology became the science of behavior and psychoanalysis became
the science of personality. |
2003-05-18N |
|
Hampshire,
Stuart |
Until
well past the time of Newton there was no distinction between philosophy and
science. Natural philosophy was the
common term used to describe what we now call both metaphysics and physics. |
2003-06-19R |
|
Harry,
Debbie |
Die
young stay pretty. |
2002-12-03T |
|
Harry,
Debbie |
I’m
not living in the real world no more. |
2002-11-26T |
|
Hawking,
Stephen |
Every
time someone mentions Schrödinger's Cat, I go for my gun. |
|
|
Hawking,
Stephen |
I
want to know what happened between 10^-43 and 10^-33 seconds after the big
bang. It is there where all the
ultimate questions about the universe, including life itself, are answered. |
|
|
Hawking,
Stephen |
Nobody
wants to believe that the truth is as simple as it is. |
2003-03-09N |
|
Hawking,
Stephen —concluding paragraph from A Brief History of Time (1996) |
When
we combine quantum theory and relativity, there seems to be the possibility
that space and time might form a finite, four-dimensional continuum without
singularities or boundaries. If we do
discover a complete theory of everything, it should be understandable by
everyone and not just a few scientists.
Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists and ordinary people, be
able to take part in discussing questions as to why both we and the universe
exist. If we find the answer to that
it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason—for then we would at last
know the mind of God. |
2003-06-04W |
|
Hawking,
Stephen —concluding paragraph from A Brief History of Time (1996) |
When
we combine quantum theory and relativity, there seems to be the possibility
that space and time might form a finite, four-dimensional continuum without
singularities or boundaries. If we do
discover a complete theory of everything, it should be understandable by
everyone and not just a few scientists.
Then we shall all, philosophers, scientists and ordinary people, be
able to take part in discussing questions as to why both we and the universe
exist. If we find the answer to that
it would be the ultimate triumph of human reason—for then we would at last
know the mind of God. |
2003-02-24M |
|
Hawkins,
Stephen |
Every
time someone mentions Schrödinger’s cat, I go for my gun. |
2002-11-26T |
|
Hegel,
G.W. |
History
teaches us that we have never learned anything from history. |
2002-12-24T |
|
Hegel,
GW |
The
finite has no genuine Being. |
2003-05-10S |
|
Hegel,
GW |
There
soon creeps in the misconception of already knowing before you actually know. |
2003-05-12M |
|
Heidegger,
Martin |
Thinking
only begins at the point where we come to know that human reason, glorified
for centuries, is the most obstinate adversary of thought. |
2003-01-23R |
|
Heisenberg,
Werner |
Einstein
once maintained against me that theory first decides what can be observed. |
2003-05-22R |
|
Heisenberg,
Werner |
Galileo
turned away from the traditional science of his time that was based on
Aristotle and took up the philosophical ideas of Plato. He replaced the descriptive science of
Aristotle by the structural science of Plato. |
2003-06-19R |
|
Heisenberg,
Werner |
In
the early twenties we knew that Bohr’s model of the atom could not be
correct, but that it pointed in the right direction. |
2003-06-27F |
|
Heisenberg,
Werner |
Just
as in relativity the old concept of simultaneity had to be abandon, so too in
quantum theory the notion of electron pathways had to be given up. |
|
|
Heisenberg,
Werner |
Just
as relativity had to abandon the concept of simultaneity, so too does quantum
theory have to abandon the concept of electron paths. The history of physics teaches us that the
abandonment of earlier concepts is much more difficult than the adaptation of
new ones. |
2003-08-14R |
|
Heisenberg,
Werner |
The
history of physics in this century teaches us that the abandonment of earlier
concepts is much more difficult than the adaptation of new ones. |
2003-03-03M |
|
Heisenberg,
Werner |
The
violent reaction to the recent developments of modern physics can only be
understood when one realizes that the foundations of physics have started
moving—and that this motion has caused the feeling that the ground would be
cut from science. |
2003-03-18T |
|
Hemingway,
Ernest |
I
was always embarrassed by the words sacred, glorious, and sacrifice and the
expression in vain. We had heard them, sometimes standing in the rain almost
out of earshot, so that only the shouted words came through, and had read them,
on proclamations that were slapped up by billposters over other
proclamations, now for a long time, and I had seen nothing sacred, and the
things that were glorious had no glory and the sacrifices were like the
stockyards at Chicago if nothing was done with the meat except to bury it.
There were many words that you could not stand to hear and finally only the
names of places had dignity. Certain numbers were the same way and certain
dates and these with the names of places were all you could say and have them
mean anything. Abstract words such as glory, honor, courage, or hallow were
obscene beside the concrete names of villages, the numbers of roads, the
names of rivers, the numbers of regiments and the dates. |
|
|
Heraclitus |
Character
is destiny. |
|
|
Heraclitus |
One
cannot step in the same river twice. |
2003-05-30F |
|
Heraclitus |
The
way up and the way back are the same. |
2003-05-30F |
|
Hobbes,
Thomas |
Unless
sovereignty finds concrete expression in an individual, it neither commands
the allegiance of the people nor supports the cohesion of the state. |
2003-04-10R |
|
Hoffman,
Philip Seymour |
Listen,
my advise to you, and I know you think these guys are your friends, if you
want to be a true friend to them—be honest and unmerciful. |
2003-05-26M |
|
Hoffman,
Philip Seymour |
The
only true currency in this bankrupt world is what you share with someone else
when you are uncool. |
2003-05-28W |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
Great
science transcends logic. |
2003-03-04T |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
Great
science transcends logic. |
2002-12-07S |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
Hermann
Weyl (1885-1955) made everybody realize that to treat gravity as an aspect of
geometry but not to do so with electromagnetism was artless. At the time, gravity and electromagnetism
were the two known universal forces. |
2003-03-09N |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
Quantum
theory does not hold undisputed sway, but must share dominion with that other
rebel sibling—relativity. And although
these two bodies together have led to the most penetrating advances in the
search for knowledge—they must remain enemies. Their fundamental disagreement will not be
resolved until both are subdued by a still more powerful theory that will
sweep away our present painfully won fancies concerning such things as space,
time, matter, radiation and causality.
The nature of this theory may only be surmised—but it will ultimately
come down to the very same certainty as to whether our civilization as a
whole survives—no more no less. |
2005-08-03W |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
Quantum
theory does not hold undisputed sway, but must share dominion with that other
rebel sibling—relativity. And although
these two bodies together have led to the most penetrating advances in the
search for knowledge—they must remain enemies. Their fundamental disagreement will not be
resolved until both are subdued by a still more powerful theory that will
sweep away our present painfully won fancies concerning such things as space,
time, matter, radiation and causality.
The nature of this theory may only be surmised—but it will ultimately
come down to the very same certainty as to whether our civilization as a
whole survives—no more no less. |
2003-01-11S |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
Quantum
theory does not hold undisputed sway, but must share dominion with that other
rebel sibling—relativity. And although
these two bodies together have led to the most penetrating advances in the
search for knowledge—they must remain enemies. Their fundamental disagreement will not be
resolved until both are subdued by a still more powerful theory that will
sweep away our present painfully won fancies concerning such things as space,
time, matter, radiation and causality.
The nature of this theory may only be surmised—but it will ultimately
come down to the very same certainty as to whether our civilization as a
whole survives—no more no less. |
2002-12-24T |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
So
abstract a matter as the quantum theory serves well as the basis for learned
treatises whose pages overflow with the unfriendly symbols of higher
mathematics. Here is a glimpse of the
scientific theorist at work, pen and paper his implements, as he experiments
with ideas. Not the least of his gifts
is a talent for reaching valuable conclusions from what later prove to be
faulty premises. For his insight is
penetrating. Be it a hint here or a
clue there, a crude analogy or a wild guess, he fashions working hypotheses
from whatever material is at hand, and, with the divine gift of intuition for
guide, courageously follows the faintest will-o-the-wisp till it show him the
way toward truth. |
2003-06-25W |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
The
factors that first led physicists to distrust their faith in a smoothly
functioning mechanical universe loomed on the inner and outer horizons of
knowledge—in the unseen realm of the atom and in the fathomless depths of
intergalactic space. To describe these phenomena quantitatively, two great
theoretical systems were developed between 1900 and 1927. One was the quantum
theory, dealing with the fundamental units of matter and energy. The other
was relativity, dealing with space, time and the structure of the universe as
a whole. |
2004-12-06M |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
The
magnificent rise of the quantum to a dominant position in modern science and
philosophy is a story of drama and high adventure often well-nigh
incredible. It is a chaotic tale, but
amid the apparent chaos one gradually discerns a splendid architecture, each
discovery, however seemingly irrelevant or nonsensical, falling cunningly
into its appointed place till the whole intricate jigsaw is revealed as one
of the major discoveries of the human mind. |
2003-06-25W |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
The
story of relativity tells what happened to science when one provisional theory
of space and time yields to another.
The story of the quantum tells of adventures which recently befell our
theories of matter and radiation, and of their unexpected consequences. |
2003-06-25W |
|
Hoffmann,
Banesh |
What
are those potent wraiths we call space and time, without which our universe
would be inconceivable? What is that mystic essence, matter, which exists
within us and around in so many wondrous forms; which is at once the servant
and master of mind, and holds proud rank in the hierarchy of the universe as
a primary instrument of divine creation?
And what is that swiftest of celestial messengers, radiation, which
leaps the empty vastnesses of space with lightning speed? Though true answers there can be none,
science is fated to fret about such problems.
It must forever spin tentative theories around them, seeking to entrap
therewith some germ of truth upon which to poise its intricate
superstructure. The balance is
delicate and every change sends tremors coursing through the edifice to its
uttermost tip. |
2003-06-25W |
|
Holmes,
Oliver Wendell |
Every
opinion tends to become a law. |
2003-07-07M |
|
Holmes,
Oliver Wendell |
Whenever
I want to understand what is really happening today or try to decide what
will happen tomorrow—I look back. |
|
|
Homer |
Put
me on earth again and I would rather be a serf in the house of some landless
man than the king of all these dead men that are done with life. |
2003-07-07M |
|
Hoover,
Herbert Clark |
We
are in danger of developing the cult of the Everyman—meaning a cult of
mediocrity. |
2003-07-07M |
|
Horowitz,
Vladimir |
Mozart
is too simple for beginners and too difficult for experts. |
2003-03-18T |
|
Housman,
AE |
A
moment’s thought would have shown him.
But a moment is a long time and thinking is a painful thing. |
2003-03-13R |
|
Hubben,
William |
Modern
man wants neither God nor Christ—for what he desires is simply the authority
of the Church. He wants the physical
security of bread, the spiritual security of dogma, and the so-called proof
of the existence of miracles. To
follow God irrespective of the consequences presents too great a risk. The Church offers up a lighter burden. It serves, selects and explains the truth,
forgives sins and bestows upon man the happiness of children. Yet the price is high. Man must surrender his freedom of thought
and, indeed, he willingly does so. He
no longer serves God as God demands of him, but only as the Church tells him
so. God’s mysteries and miracles are
henceforth monopolized and administered by the Church. |
2002-12-07S |
|
Hubben,
William |
To
be fully human means to perpetually face new moral choices. |
2002-11-20W |
|
Hugo,
Victor |
To
name Voltaire is to characterize the entire eighteenth century. |
2003-05-12M |
|
Hutchins,
Robert Maynard |
The
death of a democracy is not likely to be an assassination by ambush. It will
be a slow extinction from apathy, indifference and undernourishment. |
2003-03-20R |
|
—Introductory
paragraph from The Strange Story of the Quantum (1947) by Banesh Hoffmann |
The
story of the quantum is a confused and groping search for knowledge conducted
by scientists of many lands on a front far wider than the world of physics
had ever seen before—illuminated by flashes of insight, aided by accidents
and guesses, and enlivened by coincidences that one would only expect to find
in works of fiction. It is the story
of turbulent revolution—of the undermining of a complacent physics that had
long ruled a limited domain, of a subsequent interregnum predestined for its
own destruction by its inherent contradictions, and of the tempestuous
emergence of a much more chastened regime—quantum theory. And while quantum theory rules newly
discovered land with a firm hand, its victory is not complete. What looks like mere scratches on the
brilliant surface of its domain reveal themselves as fascinating crevasses
betraying the darkness within and luring the intrepid on to new
adventure. Nor does quantum theory
hold undisputed sway but must share dominion with that other rebel
sibling—relativity. And although
together these two bodies have led to the most penetrating advances in the
search for knowledge—they must remain enemies. Their fundamental disagreement will not be
resolved until both are subdued by a still more powerful theory that will
sweep away our present painfully won fancies concerning such things as space,
time, matter, radiation and causality.
The nature of this theory may only be surmised—but it will ultimately
come down to the very same certainty as to whether our civilization as a
whole survives—no more no less. |
2003-02-25T |
|
Jaeger,
Werner |
Once
a human potentiality is realized, it exists. |
2003-06-23M |
|
James,
William |
Belief
in the thing creates the thing. |
2002-09-16M |
|
James,
William |
The
whole drift of my education goes to persuading me that the world of our
present consciousness is only one out of many worlds of consciousness that
exist. |
|
|
James,
William |
The
world is all the richer for having the Devil in it—so long as we do not
forget to keep our foot firmly planted on his neck. |
2002-12-21S |
|
James,
William |
Wisdom
is the art of knowing what to overlook. |
|
|
Jeans,
Sir James |
A
soap-bubble with corrugations on its surface is perhaps the best simple and
familiar representation of the new universe revealed to us by Einstein’s
relativity. The universe is not the
interior of the soap-bubble but its surface, and we must always remember that
while the surface of the soap bubble has only two dimensions, the universe
bubble has four—three spatial and one of temporal. And the substance out of
which this bubble is blown, the soap-film, is empty space welded onto empty
time. |
2002-12-30M |
|
Jeans,
Sir James |
God
is a mathematician. |
2002-11-29F |
|
Jeans,
Sir James |
The
hard sphere has always a definite position in space; the electron apparently
has not. A hard sphere takes up a very definite amount of room; an
electron—well it is probably as meaningless to discuss how much room an
electron takes up as it is to discuss how much room fear, anxiety or
uncertainty takes up. |
2003-04-10R |
|
Jeans,
Sir James |
The
hard sphere has always a definite position in space; the electron apparently
has not. A hard sphere takes up a very definite amount of room; an
electron—well it is probably as meaningless to discuss how much room an
electron takes up as it is to discuss how much room a fear, an anxiety, or an
uncertainty takes up. |
|
|
Jefferson,
President Thomas |
We
hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that
they are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights, that among
these are life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments
are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the
governed. That whenever any form of
government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the right of the people
to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new government, laying its
foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to
them shall seem most likely to effect their safety and happiness. |
2003-08-28R |
|
Jefferson,
Thomas |
A
wise and frugal government shall restrain men from injuring one another and
shall leave them otherwise free to regulate their own pursuits of industry
and improvement and shall not take from the mouth of labor the bread it has
earned. This is the sum total of good
government. |
2003-03-20R |
|
Jefferson,
Thomas |
I
have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of
tyranny over the mind of man. |
|
|
Jefferson,
Thomas |
I
know no safer depository for the ultimate powers of society but with the
people themselves. And if we think
them not enlightened enough to exercise control with wholesome discretion,
the remedy is not to take it from them but to shed light on their discretion. |
2003-03-18T |
|
Jefferson,
Thomas |
I
swear my hostility to every form of tyranny over the mind of man. |
2003-02-14F |
|
Jefferson,
Thomas |
I'm
a great believer in luck, and I find the harder I work, the more I have of
it. |
|
|
Jefferson,
Thomas |
Nothing
can stop the man with the right mental attitude from achieving his goal;
nothing on earth can help the man with the wrong mental attitude. |
|
|
Jefferson,
Thomas |
On
matters of style, swim with the current.
On matters of principle, stand like a rock. |
2003-03-20R |
|
Johnson,
Lyndon |
At
the desk where I sit, I have learned one great truth. The answer for all our
national problems—the answer for all the problems of the world comes to a
single word. That word is education. |
|
|
Jones,
Franklin |
Children
are unpredictable. You never know what inconsistency they’re going to catch
you in next. |
|
|
Jones,
Franklin |
You
can learn many things from children. How much patience you have, for
instance. |
|
|
Jung,
Carl |
Modern
man has acquired the willpower to carryout his work proficiently without
recourse to chanting, drumming or praying.
He is able to translate his ideas into actions without a hitch, while
primitive man was hampered by fears and superstitions at each step along the
way. Yet in maintaining his creed,
modern man pays the price in a remarkable lack of introspection. He is blind to the fact that, with all his
rationality and efficiency, he is possessed by powers beyond his control that
keep him restlessly on the run. |
2003-03-20R |
|
Jung,
Carl |
Modern
man has acquired the willpower to carryout his work proficiently without
recourse to chanting, drumming or praying. He thoughtfully and skillfully
translates his ideas into actions without a hitch—while primitive man was
hampered by fears and superstitions at each step along the way. Yet in
maintaining his creed, modern man pays the price in a remarkable lack of
introspection. He is blind to the fact that, with all his rationality and
efficiency, he is possessed by powers beyond his control that keep him
restlessly on the run. |
2002-12-19R |
|
Jung,
Carl |
My
life is a story of the self-realization of the unconscious. |
2002-12-19R |
|
Kafka,
Franz |
You
are free and that is why you are lost. |
2002-07-10W |
|
Kaku,
Michio |
During
the period from 2020 to 2050 we are likely to enter the fourth phase of
computing, when intelligent automatons begin to walk the earth, and populate
the internet. Beyond 2050 we are
likely to enter the fifth phase of computing, with the beginnings of robots
with consciousness and self-awareness. |
2002-06-27R |
|
Kaku,
Michio |
Einstein
always began with the simplest possible ideas, and then put them into their
proper context. But Einstein failed in
his attempt to create a unified field theory because he abandoned this simple
conceptual approach and instead resorted to the safety of obscure
mathematics. |
2002-07-10W |
|
Kaku,
Michio |
In
many ways the destinies of Einstein and Heisenberg were strangely interwoven,
although the theories they created, relativity and quantum theory, are
universes apart. Both were
revolutionary iconoclasts who challenged the established wisdom of their
predecessors. |
2002-07-10W |
|
Kaku,
Michio |
Neither
relativity nor quantum theory by themselves provides a satisfactory
description of nature. Einstein showed
that relativity theory alone cannot form the basis for the unified field
theory. Nor is quantum theory
satisfactory without relativity. Quantum
theory can only be used to calculate the behavior of atoms and not the
large-scale behavior of galaxies and the expanding universe. Merging the two theories has consumed the
Herculean efforts of scores of theoretical physicists for the past half century. Only in the last few years have physicists
finally formulated, with the help of superstring theory, a possible synthesis
of the two theories. |
2003-08-14R |
|
Kaku,
Michio |
Relativity
asks questions like—Is there a beginning and end to time? Where is the farthest point in the
universe? What lies beyond the
farthest point? What happened at the
point of Creation? By contrast,
quantum theory asks the opposite questions—What is the smallest object in the
universe? Can matter be divided into
smaller and smaller units without limit?
In many ways these two theories appear to be exact opposites. Relativity concerns itself with the cosmic
motion of galaxies and the universe, while quantum mechanics probes the
subatomic world. |
2003-08-14R |
|
Kaku,
Michio |
While
relativity uncovers the secrets of energy, gravity and spacetime—the other
theory that dominated the twentieth century, quantum theory, is the theory of
matter. What Einstein didn’t realize,
as physicists do now, is that the key to the unified field theory is found in
the marriage of relativity theory and quantum theory. |
2005-08-03W |
|
Kaku,
Michio |
While
relativity uncovers the secrets of energy, gravity and spacetime—the other
theory that dominated the twentieth century, quantum theory, is the theory of
matter. What Einstein didn’t realize,
as physicists do now, is that the key to the unified field theory is found in
the marriage of relativity theory and quantum theory. |
2002-06-27R |
|
Kant,
Immanuel |
Two
things fill the mind with ever new and increasing wonder and awe—the starry
heavens above me, and the moral law within me. |
|
|
Karr,
Alphonse |
Every
man has three characters—that which he exhibits, that which he has, and that
which he thinks he has. |
2002-12-19R |
|
Keats,
John |
I
am certain of nothing but the holiness of the heart’s affections, and the
truth of imagination. |
|
|
Keats,
John |
Truth
is beauty and beauty is truth. That is
all ye know on earth and all ye need to know. |
2002-11-29F |
|
Keller,
Helen |
Life
is a daring adventure or nothing at all. |
|
|
Keller,
Helen |
Science
may have found a cure for most evils, but it has found no remedy for the
worst evil of them all—the apathy of human beings. |
2002-12-30M |
|
Kennedy,
John Fitzgerald |
A
man does what he must in spite of personal consequences, in spite of
obstacles, dangers and pressures. This
is the basis of morality. |
|
|
Kennedy,
John Fitzgerald |
Ask
not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country. |
|
|
Kennedy,
John Fitzgerald |
I
call for a new world of law, where the strong are just and the weak secure
and the peace preserved. I recognize
the difficulties of this goal—for all this will not be finished in the first
100 days, nor will it be finished in the first 1000 days, nor in the life of
this administration, nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet. But let us begin. |
2002-07-10W |
|
Kennedy,
John Fitzgerald |
The
best time to repair a roof is when the sun is shining. |
2004-11-28N |
|
Kennedy,
Robert |
Few
will have the greatness to bend history itself; but each of us can work to
change a small portion of events, and in the total of all those acts will be
written the history of this generation. |
|
|
Kennedy,
Robert |
Only
those who dare to fail greatly can ever achieve greatly. |
2003-03-28F |
|
Kennedy,
Robert |
Some
people see things as they are and say why. I dream of things that never were
and ask why not? |
|
|
Kennedy,
Robert |
The
future does not belong to those who are content with today, apathetic toward
common problems and their fellow man alike, timid and fearful in the face of
bold projects and new ideas. Rather, it will belong to those who can blend
passion, reason and courage in a personal commitment to the great enterprises
and ideals of society. |
2003-01-18S |
|
Kidman,
Nicole |
All
I want is a straight fucking answer. |
2003-01-07T |
|
Kierkegaard,
Søren |
Life
can only be understood backwards but must be lived forwards. |
2003-05-26M |
|
Kierkegaard,
Søren |
The
existentialist is first and foremost an individual who is in an infinite
relationship with himself and his destiny. |
2004-11-28N |
|
King
James VI |
God
gives not Kings the style of Gods in vain, For on his throne his Scepter do
they sway—and as their subjects ought them to obey, Kings should fear and
serve their god again. If then ye would enjoy a happier reign, observe the
statutes of your Heavenly King; and from his law, make all your Laws to
spring—Since his Lieutenant hear ye should remain, reward the just, be
steadfast, true and plain—repress the proud, maintaining ay the right, walk
always so, as ever in his sight who guards the godly, plaguing the profane,
and so ye shall in princely virtues shine. Resembling right your mighty King
Divine. |
|
|
King,
Martin Luther Jr |
Nothing
in the world is more dangerous than sincere ignorance and conscientious
stupidity. |
2003-07-14M |
|
King,
Martin Luther Jr. |
Even
if I knew that tomorrow the world would go to pieces, I would still plant my
apple tree. |
|
|
King,
Martin Luther Jr. |
He
who is devoid of the power to forgive is devoid of the power to love. |
|
|
King,
Martin Luther Jr. |
No
man is worth his salt who is not ready at all times to risk his body, to risk
his well-being, to risk his life, in a great cause. |
|
|
King,
Martin Luther Jr. |
One
who condones evils is just as guilty as the one who perpetrates it. |
|
|
King,
Martin Luther Jr. |
Our
lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter. |
|
|
King,
Martin Luther Jr. |
The
old law about an eye for an eye leaves everybody blind. |
|
|
King,
Martin Luther Jr. |
The
time is always right to do the right thing. |
|
|
King,
Martin Luther Jr. |
We
must use time creatively, in the knowledge that the time is always ripe to do
right. |
|
|
Kipling,
Rudyard |
If
any question why we died tell them because our fathers lied. |
2003-07-14M |
|
Klein,
Alberta Premier Ralph |
Give
a man a barbequed child and he will eat for a day. Teach a man how to force a
wrongheaded education on the children and he can feed off them for an entire
political lifetime. |
2003-01-06M |
|
Kopp,
Sheldon |
The
anti-hero of Franz Kafka’s hauntingly sinister novel, The Castle, is a
wandering stranger, perhaps a land-surveyor.
He is a hapless wayfarer, searching for some confirmation of his
identity. He is K, a man with no more
name than that. He strives desperately
to attain a place for himself within the authority of The Castle, wishing to
trade his lonely rootlessness, his permanent homelessness, for a sense of
belonging to something greater than himself.
But the harder he tries to make contact with the faceless authorities
who run The Castle, the more he is confronted with the frustration of their
vagueness and impersonality. He just
cannot get the hang of their ambiguous procedures. He is ever in a state of doubt. At times he feels unfairly treated and so
responds with ineffectual defiance.
But more often, he feels vaguely guilty, as though his frustration
must be his own fault. After all, if
there is a rule, it must have some meaning.
There must be some sense to their incomprehensible regulations. In his isolation and impotence, he senses
that the problem must be the result of his own basic inferiority. He is again and again stuck in the
obsessional mire of his indecision, his unwillingness to choose between
freedom and obligation. He feels that
he must keep on trying. There must be
a way to satisfy the unclear requirements of the authorities, to behave
satisfactorily so that they will accept him.
If only he could figure out the rules, then he would follow them. |
2003-05-12M |
|
Laertius,
Diogerles |
When
asked how much educated men were superior to those uneducated, Aristotle
answered—As much as the living are to the dead. |
|
|
Lao-tse |
He
who knows others is wise. He who knows himself is enlightened. |
2005-09-28W |
|
Lavine,
Thelma |
According
to the Cartesian cogito, the one truth that is safe and secure from
any doubt is that of my own existence as a conscious subject—thereby
introducing subjectivity into modern philosophy. |
2003-06-23M |
|
Lavine,
Thelma |
The
principle concerns expressed by the writers of the Renaissance was the need
to restore to man the capacities, strengths and powers of the individual
person for which the Dark Ages (430-1630) had denied. |
2003-06-20F |
|
Lavine,
Thelma |
The
way in which Plato solved the problems of philosophy was to identify what was
true in each of the conflicting philosophies and then marshal these truths
into a single, unified, original philosophy of his own. |
2003-06-20F |
|
Lawrence,
DH |
Everything
that can possibly be painted has been painted, every brush-stroke that can
possibly be laid on canvas has been laid on.
Then suddenly at the age of forty I began painting myself and became
fascinated. |
2003-05-22R |
|
Lee,
Robert E. |
The
education of a man is never completed until he dies. |
2005-09-28W |
|
Leibnitz,
Gottfried |
I
am able to prove that not only light, color, heat, and the like, but motion,
shape, and extension too are mere apparent qualities. |